The Effects of Cell Phone and Text Message Conversations on Simulated Street Crossing

Objective: A fully immersive, high-fidelity street-crossing simulator was used to examine the effects of texting on pedestrian street-crossing performance. Background: Research suggests that street-crossing performance is impaired when pedestrians engage in cell phone conversations. Less is known about the impact of texting on street-crossing performance. Method: Thirty-two young adults completed three distraction conditions in a simulated street-crossing task: no distraction, phone conversation, and texting. A hands-free headset and a mounted tablet were used to conduct the phone and texting conversations, respectively. Participants moved through the virtual environment via a manual treadmill, allowing them to select crossing gaps and change their gait. Results: During the phone conversation and texting conditions, participants had fewer successful crossings and took longer to initiate crossing. Furthermore, in the texting condition, smaller percentage of time with head orientation toward the tablet, fewer number of head orientations toward the tablet, and greater percentage of total characters typed before initiating crossing predicted greater crossing success. Conclusion: Our results suggest that (a) texting is as unsafe as phone conversations for street-crossing performance and (b) when subjects completed most of the texting task before initiating crossing, they were more likely to make it safely across the street. Application: Sending and receiving text messages negatively impact a range of real-world behaviors. These results may inform personal and policy decisions.

[1]  John G. Gaspar,et al.  Increased cognitive load leads to impaired mobility decisions in seniors at risk for falls. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Charles H Hillman,et al.  Role of childhood aerobic fitness in successful street crossing. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Frank Drews,et al.  Text Messaging During Simulated Driving , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Jeremy D Sudweeks,et al.  Driver performance while text messaging using handheld and in-vehicle systems. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Richard Wener,et al.  Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Joel M. Cooper,et al.  The Effects of Reading and Writing Text-Based Messages While Driving , 2011 .

[8]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[9]  P. Baltes,et al.  Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  The role of executive function and attention in gait , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  John G. Gaspar,et al.  Do athletes excel at everyday tasks? , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Barbara Metz,et al.  Measuring Visual Distraction in Driving: The Potential of Head Movement Analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Jonathon Love,et al.  Software to Sharpen Your Stats , 2015 .

[15]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Driving impairs talking , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Susan Kemper,et al.  The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[18]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Are Gamers Better Crossers? An Examination of Action Video Game Experience and Dual Task Effects in a Simulated Street Crossing Task , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Derek Troyer,et al.  Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Katherine W. Byington,et al.  Effect of Cell Phone Distraction on Pediatric Pedestrian Injury Risk , 2009, Pediatrics.

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[24]  J. Duysens,et al.  Distraction Affects the Performance of Obstacle Avoidance During Walking , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[26]  John G. Gaspar,et al.  Walking and talking: dual-task effects on street crossing behavior in older adults. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Jan Sprenger,et al.  Testing a Precise Null Hypothesis: The Case of Lindley’s Paradox , 2013, Philosophy of Science.