Baboons (Papio papio) Process a Context-Free but Not a Context-Sensitive Grammar

Language processing involves the ability to master supra-regular grammars, that go beyond the level of complexity of regular grammars. This ability has been hypothesized to be a uniquely human capacity. Our study probed baboons’ capacity to learn two supra-regular grammars of different levels of complexity: a context-free grammar generating sequences following a mirror structure (e.g., AB | BA, ABC | CBA) and a context-sensitive grammar generating sequences following a repeat structure (e.g., AB | AB, ABC | ABC), the latter requiring greater computational power to be processed. Fourteen baboons were tested in a prediction task, requiring them to track a moving target on a touchscreen. In distinct experiments, sequences of target locations followed one of the above two grammars, with rare violations. Baboons showed slower response times when violations occurred in mirror sequences, but did not react to violations in repeat sequences, suggesting that they learned the context-free (mirror) but not the context-sensitive (repeat) grammar. By contrast, humans tested with the same task learned both grammars. These data suggest a difference in sensitivity in baboons between a context-free and a context-sensitive grammar.

[1]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[2]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Do Humans Really Learn AnBn Artificial Grammars From Exemplars? , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Nathan M. Young,et al.  Primate molecular divergence dates. , 2006, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[4]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Artificial Grammar Learning Capabilities in an Abstract Visual Task Match Requirements for Linguistic Syntax , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[5]  P. Marler A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. , 1970 .

[6]  Alaa A. Kharbouch,et al.  Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  J. J. Rivera,et al.  Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  Aging Effect on Visual and Spatial Components of Working Memory , 2007, International journal of aging & human development.

[10]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neural circuits of hierarchical visuo-spatial sequence processing , 2009, Brain Research.

[11]  Dezhe Z. Jin,et al.  Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation , 2010, Nature.

[12]  A. Rey,et al.  Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: Evidence from baboons (Papio Papio) , 2012, Cognition.

[13]  Christopher Culy,et al.  The complexity of the vocabulary of Bambara , 1985 .

[14]  D. Grossi,et al.  Effects of Age, Education and Sex on Two Tests of Immediate Memory: A Study of Normal Subjects from 20 to 99 Years of Age , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Jun Lai,et al.  The impact of adjacent-dependencies and staged-input on the learnability of center-embedded hierarchical structures , 2011, Cognition.

[16]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia) , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Sequential Expectations: The Role of Prediction-Based Learning in Language , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[19]  W. Fitch,et al.  More than one way to see it: Individual heuristics in avian visual computation , 2015, Cognition.

[20]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Michael A. Long,et al.  Stable Sequential Activity Underlying the Maintenance of a Precisely Executed Skilled Behavior , 2018, Neuron.

[23]  W Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[24]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Pattern perception and computational complexity: introduction to the special issue , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  J. Fagot,et al.  A comparative study of working memory: Immediate serial spatial recall in baboons (Papio papio) and humans , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees , 2007, Current Biology.

[27]  C. Krause,et al.  Palaeontological evidence for an Oligocene divergence between Old World monkeys and apes , 2013, Nature.

[28]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Margaret F. Carr,et al.  Hippocampal replay in the awake state: a potential substrate for memory consolidation and retrieval , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Noviello,et al.  Catarrhine primate divergence dates estimated from complete mitochondrial genomes: concordance with fossil and nuclear DNA evidence. , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[31]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Varieties of crossing dependencies: structure dependence and mild context sensitivity , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Hongyu Guo,et al.  Long Short-Term Memory Over Recursive Structures , 2015, ICML.

[33]  Vitor C. Zimmerer,et al.  Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Birdsong neurolinguistics: songbird context-free grammar claim is premature , 2012, Neuroreport.

[35]  M. Ullman,et al.  Working memory in older adults declines with age, but is modulated by sex and education , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  James Rogers,et al.  Formal language theory: refining the Chomsky hierarchy , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  The language of geometry: Fast comprehension of geometrical primitives and rules in human adults and preschoolers , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  J. Fagot,et al.  Automatic testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groups , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[41]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models. , 2016, Psychological review.

[42]  W. Fitch Bio-Linguistics: Monkeys Break Through the Syntax Barrier , 2018, Current Biology.

[43]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  What do animals learn in artificial grammar studies? , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[45]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Conserved Sequence Processing in Primate Frontal Cortex , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[46]  J. Fagot,et al.  Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: Use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio) , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[47]  A. Rey,et al.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Production of Supra-regular Spatial Sequences by Macaque Monkeys , 2018, Current Biology.

[49]  Willem H. Zuidema,et al.  Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Fenna H. Poletiek,et al.  What baboons can (not) tell us about natural language grammars , 2016, Cognition.

[51]  Christopher I. Petkov,et al.  On the pursuit of the brain network for proto-syntactic learning in non-human primates: conceptual issues and neurobiological hypotheses , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  The Non-Hierarchical Nature of the Chomsky Hierarchy-Driven Artificial-Grammar Learning , 2014, Biolinguistics.

[53]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language , 1985 .

[54]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch , 1982 .

[55]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  P. Gingerich,et al.  New Oligocene primate from Saudi Arabia and the divergence of apes and Old World monkeys , 2010, Nature.

[58]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Bootstrapping in a language of thought: A formal model of numerical concept learning , 2012, Cognition.