Face Recognition Performance: Role of Demographic Information

This paper studies the influence of demographics on the performance of face recognition algorithms. The recognition accuracies of six different face recognition algorithms (three commercial, two nontrainable, and one trainable) are computed on a large scale gallery that is partitioned so that each partition consists entirely of specific demographic cohorts. Eight total cohorts are isolated based on gender (male and female), race/ethnicity (Black, White, and Hispanic), and age group (18-30, 30-50, and 50-70 years old). Experimental results demonstrate that both commercial and the nontrainable algorithms consistently have lower matching accuracies on the same cohorts (females, Blacks, and age group 18-30) than the remaining cohorts within their demographic. Additional experiments investigate the impact of the demographic distribution in the training set on the performance of a trainable face recognition algorithm. We show that the matching accuracy for race/ethnicity and age cohorts can be improved by training exclusively on that specific cohort. Operationally, this leads to a scenario, called dynamic face matcher selection, where multiple face recognition algorithms (each trained on different demographic cohorts) are available for a biometric system operator to select based on the demographic information extracted from a probe image. This procedure should lead to improved face recognition accuracy in many intelligence and law enforcement face recognition scenarios. Finally, we show that an alternative to dynamic face matcher selection is to train face recognition algorithms on datasets that are evenly distributed across demographics, as this approach offers consistently high accuracy across all cohorts.

[1]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[2]  J. Brigham,et al.  Cross-Racial Identification , 1989 .

[3]  Weiting Ng,et al.  Cross-Race Facial Recognition , 1994 .

[4]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[5]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[7]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Bayesian face recognition , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  R. McCabe,et al.  Information Technology: American National Standard for Information Systems: Data Format for the Interchange of Fingerprint, Facial, & Scar Mark & Tattoo (SMT) Information , 2000 .

[11]  P J. Phillips,et al.  Face Recognition Vendor Test 2000: Evaluation Report , 2001 .

[12]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Yajie Tian,et al.  Handbook of face recognition , 2003 .

[16]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[17]  Xiaogang Wang,et al.  A unified framework for subspace face recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  LinLin Shen,et al.  A review on Gabor wavelets for face recognition , 2006, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[19]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Xiaogang Wang,et al.  Random Sampling for Subspace Face Recognition , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[21]  R. Mei,et al.  A genomewide admixture mapping panel for Hispanic/Latino populations. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  Lior Wolf,et al.  Using Biologically Inspired Features for Face Processing , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Eigenfeature Regularization and Extraction in Face Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the “other-race” effect , 2010 .

[25]  Xiaoyang Tan,et al.  Enhanced Local Texture Feature Sets for Face Recognition Under Difficult Lighting Conditions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  On a taxonomy of facial features , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[28]  George W. Quinn,et al.  Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms , 2011 .

[29]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition challenge problem , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[30]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Linear Subspace Learning-Based Dimensionality Reduction , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[31]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Face recognition across time lapse: On learning feature subspaces , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[32]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Demographic effects on estimates of automatic face recognition performance , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[33]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  An other-race effect for face recognition algorithms , 2011, TAP.

[34]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Face Matching and Retrieval in Forensics Applications , 2012, IEEE MultiMedia.