Iridium Oxide (IrOx) serves as adhesion promoter for conducting polymers on neural microelectrodes

Conducting polymers (CPs) as functional coatings on microelectrodes enable the realization of neural probes with superior electrical properties compared to metallized probes. Besides significantly lower impedance and enhanced charge delivery capacity, CPs further feature the possibility to release drugs from their bulk which can be done exclusively from these materials. Thus the usage of CPs at the neural interface for recording or stimulation of neural tissue is of great interest. A drawback that has however been observed at usage of conducting polymers in vitro and in vivo is the weak adhesion of the polymer to the substrate which ultimately leads to delamination of the coatings. This effect has limited the applicability of polymer coatings on neural probes despite their overall promising potential. In our study we address this gap by introducing Iridium Oxide (IrOx) as adhesion promoter for long-term stabilization of CP films. Exaggerated stressing protocols revealed superior adhesion of the polymer to the rough structure of IrOx and electrochemical measurements indicated unrestricted polymer functionality. With the herein proposed strategy a major obstacle of using conducting polymers at the neural interface could be efficiently targeted and thus applicability of CPs for neural interfaces can be extended in future electrode generations.

[1]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  High-porous platinum electrodes for functional electrical stimulation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Xinyan Tracy Cui,et al.  Electrochemically controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer polypyrrole coated electrode. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[3]  S. Cogan Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[4]  O. Inganäs,et al.  Electroactive polymers for neural interfaces , 2010 .

[5]  Hans von Holst,et al.  Stability of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) materials intended for implants. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[6]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Electrochemical deposition and characterization of conducting polymer polypyrrole/PSS on multichannel neural probes , 2001 .

[7]  M. Asplund,et al.  A detailed insight into drug delivery from PEDOT based on analytical methods: Effects and side effects , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[8]  Lei He,et al.  New carbon nanotube–conducting polymer composite electrodes for drug delivery applications , 2012 .

[9]  G. Wallace,et al.  Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[10]  David C. Martin,et al.  Microporous conducting polymers on neural microelectrode arrays: II. Physical characterization , 2004 .

[11]  Xiliang Luo,et al.  Highly stable carbon nanotube doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for chronic neural stimulation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Substrate dependent stability of conducting polymer coatings on medical electrodes. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[13]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  On the stability of poly-ethylenedioxythiopene as coating material for active neural implants. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[14]  David C. Martin,et al.  Fuzzy gold electrodes for lowering impedance and improving adhesion with electrodeposited conducting polymer films , 2003 .

[15]  Yuliang Cao,et al.  Electrodeposited polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes composite films electrodes for neural interfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.