Study on Location Algorithms of Beamforming based on MVDR

Acoustic emission is an effective method of locating the rubbing fault. In or der to solve the problem that satisfactory location accuracy is difficult to obtain because of the waveform distortion caused by signal propagation during the application of time delay estimation method in acoustic emission position estimation, beam-forming technique is applied to acoustic emission source location. Simulation studies have been made on the performance of near-field time- domain and frequency domain beam-forming in the location of rubbing acoustic emission source. The paper adopts the wideband signal minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) location estimation method based on sub-band decomposition to avoid the problems of poor noise immunity and low resolution of traditional beam-forming. Decompose each group of array signals into a number of sub-band of equal length, conduct Fourier transformation on each sub-band to calculate the covariance matrix of each frequency component, get the two-dimensional joint distribution function of the MVDR output power of each sub-band with respect to the distance and azimuth angle, then synthesize the MVDR power of wideband signal, obtain the azimuth spectrum estimation of all frequency bands, and finally get the location of the acoustic source by the peak point. The experimental results show that this algorithm can accurately identify the rubbing fault location.

[1]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[2]  Sun Chang-yu Research on an efficient wideband high resolution MVDR algorithm , 2005 .

[3]  S. R. Mahadeva Prasanna,et al.  Processing of reverberant speech for time-delay estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing.

[4]  Zhao Li Research on Time Delay Estimation Algorithm Based on Generalized Cross Correlation in Acoustic Emission Source Location , 2009 .

[5]  L. D. Hall Diagnosis of continuous rotor–stator rubbing in large scale turbine units using acoustic emissions , 2004 .

[6]  L. D Hall The transmission of acoustic emission across large-scale turbine rotors , 2002 .

[7]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  Acoustic emission source localization and velocity determination of the fundamental mode A0 using wavelet analysis and a Newton-based optimization technique , 2010 .

[8]  H. Suzuki,et al.  Wavelet transform of acoustic emission signals , 1996 .

[9]  Maurizio Omologo,et al.  Acoustic source location in noisy and reverberant environment using CSP analysis , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.

[10]  Li Qihu The research on broadband beamspace minimum variance distortionlessresponse high resolution direction-of-arrival estimation methodbased on sub-band decomposition , 2004 .

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Robust minimum variance beamforming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Li Zhao,et al.  The Application of Wavelet Neural Network Optimized by Particle Swarm in Localization of Acoustic Emission Source , 2009, ICONIP.

[13]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Beamforming array techniques for acoustic emission monitoring of large concrete structures , 2010 .

[14]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Acoustic emission source location on large plate-like structures using a local triangular sensor array , 2012 .

[15]  Xu Gui-min Beamspace pre-processing on array data based on MVDR , 2008 .

[16]  Dayong Hu,et al.  Near-field beamforming analysis for acoustic emission source localization. , 2012, Ultrasonics.

[17]  Wei Liu,et al.  A comparison of adaptive beamforming implementations for wideband scenarios , 2005 .