FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH LAWS FOR BRITTLE AND DUCTILE MATERIALS INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF STATIC MODES AND ELASTIC‐PLASTIC DEFORMATION

A fatigue crack growth damage accumulation model is used to derive laws for the fatigue crack growth rates of brittle and ductile materials. The damage accumulated during cyclic loading is assumed to be proportional to the cyclic change in the plastic displacement in the crack tip yielded zone. The static mode contribution to the fatigue damage is assumed to be proportional to some power of the crack tip displacement. The laws are applicable in either the small or large scale yielding regimes provided that the stress ratio remains positive. Static modes are assumed to be controlled by the fracture toughness value in brittle materials, and by the gradient of the crack growth resistance curve in ductile materials. In the analysis of ductile materials it is assumed that the crack growth resistance of the material is not significantly altered by fatigue crack growth. The growth rate equations are expressed in terms of the near field value of the J-integral, i.e. the value which would be calculated from assuming the material deformed in a non-linear elastic manner during the increasing load part of the fatigue cycle. Examples are given of the predictions of the growth law for ductile materials. It is predicted that after the initiation of stable tearing the crack growth rate, when expressed in terms of the cyclic change in the stress intensity factor, depends on both the structural geometry and the degree of crack tip plastic deformation. In both brittle and ductile materials the fatigue crack growth rate is predicted to accelerate as the failure criteria relevant to static crack instability are approached.

[1]  R. A. Ainsworth,et al.  Workshop 1 Worked Examples Using The CEGB Procedure For The Assessment Of The Integrity Of Structures Containing Defects , 1985 .

[2]  L. E. Culver,et al.  ANALYSIS OF COMBINED STATIC AND FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH DATA , 1981 .

[3]  J. N. Robinson An experimental investigation of the effect of specimen type on the crack tip opening displacement and J-integral fracture criteria , 1976, International Journal of Fracture.

[4]  G. Smith,et al.  Crack propagation in high stress fatigue , 1962 .

[5]  C. E. Richards,et al.  The influence of stress intensity and microstructure on fatigue crack propagation in ferritic materials , 1972 .

[6]  Michael P. Wnuk,et al.  Quasi-static extension of a tensile crack contained in a viscoelastic-plastic solid , 1974 .

[7]  P. E. Irving,et al.  Prediction of fatigue crack growth rates: theory, mechanisms, and experimental results , 1977 .

[8]  John R. Rice,et al.  Mechanics of Crack Tip Deformation and Extension by Fatigue , 1967 .

[9]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[10]  John R. Rice,et al.  Continuing crack-tip deformation and fracture for plane-strain crack growth in elastic-plastic solids , 1978 .

[11]  B. Bilby,et al.  Crack growth in notch fatigue , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  L. McCartney,et al.  A generalized theory of fatigue crack propagation , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  N. Dowling,et al.  Fatigue Crack Growth During Gross Plasticity and the J-Integral , 1976 .

[14]  S. Kaiser ON THE RELATION BETWEEN STABLE CRACK GROWTH AND FATIGUE , 1983 .

[15]  T. C. Lindley,et al.  The influence of stress intensity and microstructure on fatigue crack propagation in a 1% carbon steel , 1972 .