Elements of a Cognitive Model of Physics Problem Solving: Epistemic Games.

Although much is known about the differences between expert and novice problem solvers, knowledge of those differences typically does not provide enough detail to help instructors understand why some students seem to learn physics while solving problems and others do not. A critical issue is how students access the knowledge they have in the context of solving a particular problem. In this paper, we discuss our observations of students solving physics problems in authentic situations in an algebra-based physics class at the University of Maryland. We find that when these students are working together and interacting effectively, they often use a limited set of locally coherent resources for blocks of time of a few minutes or more. This coherence appears to provide the student with guidance as to what knowledge and procedures to access and what to ignore. Often, this leads to the students failing to apply relevant knowledge they later show they possess. In this paper, we outline a theoretical phenomenology for describing these local coherences and identify six organizational structures that we refer to as epistemic games. The hypothesis that students tend to function within the narrow confines of a fairly limited set of games provides a good description of our observations. We demonstrate how students use these games in two case studies and discuss the implications for instruction.

[1]  J. Fuster Cortex and mind : unifying cognition , 2003 .

[2]  Gordon S. Novak,et al.  Representation of Models for Expert Problem Solving in Physics , 1991, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[4]  Rebecca Faith Lippmann Students' understanding of measurement and uncertainty in the physics laboratory: Social construction, underlying concepts, and quantitative analysis , 2003 .

[5]  M. McCloskey Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[6]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[7]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[8]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling student thinking , 2004 .

[9]  David Hammer,et al.  Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .

[10]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex , 1997 .

[11]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[12]  Sung-Jae Pak,et al.  Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems , 2002 .

[13]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving , 2007 .

[14]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project. , 1993 .

[15]  Eric Berne,et al.  Games People Play: The Basic Handbook of Transactional Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Beth Thacker,et al.  Recent advances in classroom physics , 2003 .

[17]  J. Larkin,et al.  Understanding and Teaching Problem‐Solving in Physics , 1979 .

[18]  Laurence Viennot,et al.  Students’ reasonings in thermodynamics , 1991 .

[19]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[20]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[21]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  John J. Clement Generation of spontaneous analogies by students solving science problems , 1987 .

[23]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where Mathematics Comes From , 2000 .

[24]  A. Schoenfeld Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[25]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[26]  Thomas M. Foster,et al.  Resource Letter RPS-1: Research in problem solving , 2004 .

[27]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[28]  Charles D. Kopec,et al.  Matters of Size , 2006, Science.

[29]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[30]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[31]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[32]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .

[33]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[34]  Juan R. Burciaga,et al.  Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite , 2004 .

[35]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[37]  John J. Clement,et al.  A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students , 1983 .

[38]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[39]  Jonathan Tuminaro,et al.  A cognitive framework for analyzing and describing introductory students' use and understanding of mathematics in physics , 2004 .

[40]  Talia Ben-Zeev,et al.  Rational Errors and the Mathematical Mind , 1998 .

[41]  Andrew Elby Helping physics students learn how to learn , 2001 .

[42]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognition of learning physics , 1981 .

[43]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .

[44]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[45]  A. diSessa,et al.  What changes in conceptual change , 1998 .

[46]  David P Maloney,et al.  Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism , 2001 .

[47]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[48]  R. Llinás I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self , 2000 .

[49]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .

[50]  L. Viennot,et al.  Students' reasoning in thermodynamics , 1991 .

[51]  Elkhonon Goldberg,et al.  The executive brain : frontal lobes and the civilized mind , 2001 .

[52]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[53]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  How Students Understand Physics Equations , 2001 .

[54]  T. Robbins,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. , 1998 .

[55]  J. Fuster Memory in the cerebral cortex : an empirical approach to neural networks in the human and nonhuman primate , 1996 .

[56]  Jonathan Tuminaro,et al.  Reverse-Engineering the Solution of a “Simple” Physics Problem: Why Learning Physics Is Harder Than It Looks , 2006 .