Toward a Typology of University Spin-offs

This paper discusses existing definitions of USOs in order to reconcile them and to provide criteria for classifying and understanding the different facets of this multi-headed concept. Drawing the boundaries of this concept and elucidating its variety through a typology are therefore the two main objectives of this paper. USOs are defined as new firms created to exploit commercially some knowledge, technology or research results developed within a university. The proposed typology is based on two key discriminatory factors, namely (1) the status of individuals involved in the new business venturing process (researchers or students) and (2) the nature of knowledge transferred from university to the new venture (codified or tacit), inducing the nature of the USO activities (product or service-oriented).

[1]  Mauri Laukkanen.  Exploring alternative approaches in high-level entrepreneurship education: creating micromechanisms for endogenous regional growth , 2000 .

[2]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure , 1997 .

[3]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[4]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities , 1988 .

[5]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations , 1998 .

[6]  Gary W. Matkin.  Technology transfer and the university , 1990 .

[7]  A. Cooper,et al.  Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship , 1971 .

[8]  Philippe Albert,et al.  Developing entrepreneurial attitudes and management competence among scientists: the Groupe ESC Lyon's experience , 1991 .

[9]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  New Venture Creation , 1994 .

[10]  Rikard Stankiewicz,et al.  Spin-off companies from universities , 1994 .

[11]  M. Cassier.  Compromis institutionnels et hybridations entre recherche publique et recherche privée , 1997 .

[12]  Karel J. Samsom,et al.  University scientists as entrepreneurs: a special case of technology transfer and high-tech venturing , 1993 .

[13]  Jacques De Bandt,et al.  Knowledge and Technology Transfer , 1999 .

[14]  Raymond Radosevich,et al.  A Comparative Study of Entrepreneurship Incidence among Inventors in National Laboratories , 1996 .

[15]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  Mapping the university technology transfer process , 1997 .

[16]  J. T. Wallmark,et al.  Spin-off companies from Chalmers University of Technology , 1982 .

[17]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Universities and local economic development: The case of Linköping , 1997 .

[18]  Julian Lowe,et al.  Commercialization of university research: A policy perspective , 1993 .

[19]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[20]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  Partnerships, Configurations and Dynamics in the Creation and Development of SMEs by Researchers , 1998 .

[21]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[22]  Fabrice Pirnay,et al.  A stage model of academic spin-off creation , 2002 .

[23]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[24]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland , 2000 .

[25]  David V. Gibson,et al.  University Spin-off Companies: Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs, and Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[26]  David Charles,et al.  Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property , 1999 .

[27]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[28]  Matti Kaulio,et al.  Strategic Paths of Academic Spin-Offs: A Comparative Analysis of Italian and Swedish Cases , 1999 .

[29]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms , 1987 .

[30]  M. Bray,et al.  University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions , 2000 .

[31]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs In High Technology , 1991 .

[32]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[33]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary , 1995 .

[34]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Growth patterns of research based spin-offs in Europe , 2000 .

[35]  J. Ivancevich.  A traditional faculty member's perspective on entrepreneurship☆ , 1991 .

[36]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Internal and External Resources in Technology-Based Spin-Offs : A Survey , 1988 .

[37]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Spin-offs from research centers at a research university☆ , 2000 .

[38]  Henry Etzkowttz,et al.  Entrepreneurial Science in the Academy: A Case of the Transformation of Norms , 1989 .

[39]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[40]  David V. Gibson,et al.  University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin , 1990 .

[41]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Enterprises from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development , 1993 .

[42]  W. McMullan,et al.  University innovation centres and academic venture formation , 1988 .

[43]  J. D. Bandt.  De la science à la connaissance: changement de paradigme ? , 1997 .

[44]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Commercial innovation from university faculty , 1981 .