Modeling slow-processing of toxin messenger RNAs in type-I toxin–antitoxin systems: post-segregational killing and noise filtering

In type-I toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems, the action of growth-inhibiting toxin proteins is counteracted by the antitoxin small RNAs (sRNAs) that prevent the translation of toxin messenger RNAs (mRNAs). When a TA module is encoded on a plasmid, the short lifetime of antitoxin sRNA compared to toxin mRNAs mediates post-segregational killing (PSK) that contribute the plasmid maintenance, while some of the chromosomal encoded TA loci have been reported to contribute to persister formation in response to a specific upstream signal. Some of the well studied type-I TA systems such as hok/sok are known to have a rather complex regulatory mechanism. Transcribed full-length toxin mRNAs fold such that the ribosome binding site is not accessible and hence cannot be translated. The mRNAs are slowly processed by RNases, and the truncated mRNAs can be either translated or bound by antitoxin sRNA to be quickly degraded. We analyze the role of this extra processing by a mathematical model. We first consider the PSK scenario, and demonstrate that the extra processing compatibly ensures the high toxin expression upon complete plasmid loss, without inducing toxin expression upon acquisition of a plasmid or decrease of plasmid number to a non-zero number. We further show that the extra processing help filtering the transcription noise, avoiding random activation of toxins in transcriptionally regulated TA systems as seen in chromosomal ones. The present model highlights impacts of the slow processing reaction, offering insights on why the slow processing reactions are commonly identified in multiple type-I TA systems.

[1]  J. W.,et al.  The Journal of Physical Chemistry , 1900, Nature.

[2]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[3]  S. Molin,et al.  Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Translational control and differential RNA decay are key elements regulating postsegregational expression of the killer protein encoded by the parB locus of plasmid R1. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  E. Wagner,et al.  Mechanism of killer gene activation. Antisense RNA-dependent RNase III cleavage ensures rapid turn-over of the stable hok, srnB and pndA effector messenger RNAs. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  E. Wagner,et al.  Mechanism of post‐segregational killing: Sok antisense RNA interacts with Hok mRNA via its 5′‐end single‐stranded leader and competes with the 3′‐end of Hok mRNA for binding to the mok translational initiation region. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[7]  A. Gultyaev,et al.  Programmed cell death by hok/sok of plasmid R1: processing at the hok mRNA 3'-end triggers structural rearrangements that allow translation and antisense RNA binding. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  A. Gultyaev,et al.  Programmed cell death by hok/sok of plasmid R1: coupled nucleotide covariations reveal a phylogenetically conserved folding pathway in the hok family of mRNAs. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  N. Brown,et al.  Molecular Microbiology , 1998, NATO ASI Series.

[10]  ScienceDirect Current opinion in microbiology , 1998 .

[11]  Hirotada Mori,et al.  Molecular characterization of long direct repeat (LDR) sequences expressing a stable mRNA encoding for a 35‐amino‐acid cell‐killing peptide and a cis‐encoded small antisense RNA in Escherichia coli , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  J. Vogel,et al.  The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide , 2004, Current Biology.

[13]  K. Gerdes,et al.  Toxin–antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Omid R Faridani,et al.  Competitive inhibition of natural antisense Sok-RNA interactions activates Hok-mediated cell killing in Escherichia coli , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  T. Hwa,et al.  Quantitative Characteristics of Gene Regulation by Small RNA , 2007, PLoS Biology.

[16]  E. Wagner,et al.  RNA antitoxins. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[17]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Efficient degradation and expression prioritization with small RNAs , 2006, Physical biology.

[18]  N. Wingreen,et al.  A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  John W. Little,et al.  RecA-dependent cleavage of LexA dimers. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Dynamic features of gene expression control by small regulatory RNAs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  S. Jonjić,et al.  Modulation of natural killer cell activity by viruses. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[22]  M. Vulić,et al.  Ciprofloxacin Causes Persister Formation by Inducing the TisB toxin in Escherichia coli , 2010, PLoS biology.

[23]  Yves Bigot,et al.  Mobile Genetic Elements , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[24]  Jan Danckaert,et al.  A General Model for Toxin-Antitoxin Module Dynamics Can Explain Persister Cell Formation in E. coli , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Wilfried Rozhon,et al.  Toxin–antitoxin systems , 2013, Mobile genetic elements.

[26]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Conditional Cooperativity of Toxin - Antitoxin Regulation Can Mediate Bistability between Growth and Dormancy , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  M. Inouye,et al.  Characterization of LdrA (Long Direct Repeat A) Protein of Escherichia coli , 2014, Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  J. Beirlant,et al.  Obg and Membrane Depolarization Are Part of a Microbial Bet-Hedging Strategy that Leads to Antibiotic Tolerance. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[29]  R. Milo,et al.  Cell Biology by the Numbers , 2015 .

[30]  K. Gerdes Hypothesis: type I toxin–antitoxin genes enter the persistence field—a feedback mechanism explaining membrane homoeostasis , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Rebecca Page,et al.  Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial growth arrest and persistence. , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[32]  E. Wagner,et al.  Two regulatory RNA elements affect TisB‐dependent depolarization and persister formation , 2017, Molecular microbiology.

[33]  F. Darfeuille,et al.  Mechanistic insights into type I toxin antitoxin systems in Helicobacter pylori: the importance of mRNA folding in controlling toxin expression , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  E. Wagner,et al.  RNA-based regulation in type I toxin–antitoxin systems and its implication for bacterial persistence , 2017, Current Genetics.

[35]  Models of Life , 2017 .

[36]  Chen Chris Gong,et al.  Modeling sRNA-Regulated Plasmid Maintenance , 2016, PloS one.