Using Origin–Destination Centrality to Estimate Directional Bicycle Volumes

A new method estimates directional bicycle volumes throughout a street network. The method is based on a modified form of centrality, a measure from graph theory used to quantify the relative importance of each link and node in a network. One common formulation of centrality calculates the number of times a link in a network is used along the path of all shortest paths between all nodes. The equation was modified to represent bicycle travel better. The new metric is called origin–destination (O-D) centrality. For this case study, the new metric exhibited high correlation (R2 = .45 to .73) with observed bicycle counts at intersections. Use of O-D centrality to interpolate field observations spatially is demonstrated. Unlike other bicycle demand estimation methods, this approach requires commonly available data, is easy to use, and produces directional volumes (some methods only estimate nondirectional aggregate counts). The new method was programmed as a tool for geographic information systems by using modifiable open-source python code. The tool requires a street network, a digital elevation map, parcel data, and observed bicycle counts at select locations throughout the study area. The observed counts can be collected through any manner, but the tool was specifically designed for planners and engineers working with count data collected manually in a manner similar to that used for the National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project.

[1]  Michael B. Lowry,et al.  Tools and Strategies for Wide-Scale Bicycle Level-of-Service Analysis , 2013 .

[2]  G. M. Davis The Department of Transportation , 1970 .

[3]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Space Syntax: Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety , 2003 .

[4]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Route choice of cyclists in Zurich , 2010 .

[6]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The social logic of space: Contents , 1984 .

[7]  Yuanyuan Zhang,et al.  Centrality Characteristics of Road Network Patterns of Traffic Analysis Zones , 2011 .

[8]  Lindsay S. Arnold,et al.  Seamless Travel: Measuring Bicycle and Pedestrian Activity in San Diego County and Its Relationship to Land Use, Transportation, Safety, and Facility Type , 2010 .

[9]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes , 2011 .

[10]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data , 2012 .

[11]  John H Suhrbier,et al.  GUIDEBOOK ON METHODS TO ESTIMATE NON-MOTORIZED TRAVEL: OVERVIEW OF METHODS , 1999 .

[12]  Michael B. Lowry,et al.  Assessment of Communitywide Bikeability with Bicycle Level of Service , 2012 .

[13]  Michigan Section,et al.  INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS , 2011 .

[14]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution , 2008 .

[15]  Sybil Derrible Using Network Centrality to Determine Key Transfer Stations in Public Transportation Systems , 2012 .

[16]  Ronald W Eash,et al.  Destination and Mode Choice Models for Nonmotorized Travel , 1999 .

[17]  Jorge Gil,et al.  Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London , 2007 .

[18]  Shawn Turner,et al.  Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Usage and Research Data Collection Equipment , 2010 .

[19]  Alan Penn,et al.  Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement , 1993 .

[20]  A. Shimbel Structural parameters of communication networks , 1953 .

[21]  黒田 孝次,et al.  Highway Capacity Manual改訂の動向--テイラ-教授の講演より , 1984 .

[22]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[23]  M Replogle,et al.  INTEGRATING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACTORS INTO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODELS: SUMMARY OF THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND SUGGESTED STEPS FORWARD , 1997 .

[24]  David Banister,et al.  Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Networks , 1998 .

[25]  Hao Liu,et al.  Application of Complex Network Theory and Genetic Algorithm in Airline Route Networks , 2011 .

[26]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Using GPS Data to Assess Bicycle Commuter Route Choice , 2008 .

[27]  A. Santos,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey , 2011 .

[28]  P. S. Hu,et al.  Summary of Travel Trends , 2004 .

[29]  Paul Waddell,et al.  Incremental Integration of Land Use and Activity-Based Travel Modeling , 2011 .

[30]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  How Does Land Use Influence Cyclist Route Choice? Geospatial Analysis of Commuter Routes and Cycling Facilities , 2011 .

[31]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey , 2003 .

[32]  Christophe Claramunt,et al.  Topological Analysis of Urban Street Networks , 2004 .

[33]  Norman W. Garrick,et al.  The Applicability of Space Syntax to Bicycle Facility Planning , 2008 .

[34]  Mia Birk,et al.  National Bicycle And Pedestrian Documentation Project , 2006 .

[35]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montréal, Canada , 2011 .

[36]  Feng Liu,et al.  Recent Practices in Regional Modeling of Nonmotorized Travel , 2012 .

[37]  Christopher D Porter,et al.  Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: State of the Practice and Research Needs , 1999 .