Highlight: Chromatographic patterns of phenolic compounds were determined for each of the common subspecies of the widespread range shrub Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus (low rabbitbrush), some other Chrysothamnus faxa, and some related Compositae genera. Each subspecies of C. viscidiflorus exhibited variation across its geographical range, but within sites the patterns were consistent. Chromatographic pattern distributions suggest a predominance of self-pollination in C. ViscidifZorus; however, the limited outcrossing has important genetic implications. Analysis of the chromatographic spot patterns revealed three groups or clusters within C. viscidiflorus. Surprisingly, C. greenei clustered more closely to some C. viscidiflorus subspecies than these subspecies clustered with other C. viscidiflorus subspecies. C. greenei clustered with ssp. lanceofatus and stenophyllus. Ssp. viscidiflorus clustered s > 0.70 with ssp. latifolius and a group of collections intermediate in morphology between ViscidifZorus and lanceolatus. It shares some intense spots with these taxa. Subspecies puberulus did not cluster at s q > 70 with any other taxon. Chromatographic data supported the independent species status of C. linifolius and the internal integrity of the three large species complexes in Chrysothamnus-C. viscidiflorus, C. nauseosus, and C. parryi. The genus Petradoria had high s values with Chrysothamnus, as did Haplopappus bloomeri. Other shrubby Compositae (Xanthocephalum sarothrae and Lepidospartum latisquamum) had much lower s values with Chrysothamnus. Chromatography complements morphology in delimiting taxonomic rank. Each Chrysothamnus taxon should be evaluated on its merits.
[1]
G. Ólafsson.
The nutritive value of range plants.
,
1980
.
[2]
E. Mcarthur,et al.
Chromatographic Recognition of Some Palatable and Unpalatable Subspecies of Rubber Rabbitbrush in and around Utah
,
1975
.
[3]
J. Ruffin.
WOOD ANATOMY OF AMPHIACHYRIS, AMPHIPAPPUS, THUROVIA, GYMNOSPERMA, AND THE XANTHOCEPHALUM COMPLEX
,
1974
.
[4]
D. L. Hanks,et al.
Chromatographic Identification of Big Sagebrush Seed
,
1973
.
[5]
C. Feddema,et al.
Foods of the Rocky Mountain mule deer
,
1973
.
[6]
B. J. Cox.
A Chemosystematic Comparison of the Lupinus lepidus-L. caespitosus Complex
,
1973
.
[7]
L. C. Anderson.
Additional Chromosome Numbers in Chrysothamnus (Asteraceae)
,
1971
.
[8]
L. C. Anderson.
EMBRYOLOGY OF CHRYSOTHAMNUS (ASTEREAE, COMPOSITAE)
,
1970
.
[9]
L. C. Anderson.
FLORAL ANATOMY OF CHRYSOTHAMNUS (ASTEREAE, COMPOSITAE)
,
1970
.
[10]
L. C. Anderson.
CYTOTAXONOMIC STUDIES IN CHRYSOTHAMNUS (ASTEREAE, COMPOSITAE)
,
1966
.
[11]
L. C. Anderson,et al.
CHRYSOTHAMNUS BOLANDERI, AN INTERGENERIC HYBRID
,
1966
.
[12]
L. C. Anderson.
TAXONOMIC NOTES ON THE CHRYSOTHAMNUS VISCIDIFLORUS COMPLEX (ASTEREAE, COMPOSITAE)
,
1964
.
[13]
L. C. Anderson.
Studies on Petradoria (Compositae): Anatomy, Cytology, Taxonomy
,
1963
.
[14]
F. Clements,et al.
The Phylogenetic Method in Taxonomy: The North American Species of Artemisia, Chrysothamnus, and Atriplex
,
2009
.