Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations

Terrestrial laser scanning, or lidar, is a recent innovation in spatial information data acquisition, which allows geological outcrops to be digitally captured with unprecedented resolution and accuracy. With point precisions and spacing of the order of a few centimetres, an enhanced quantitative element can now be added to geological fieldwork and analysis, opening up new lines of investigation at a variety of scales in all areas of field-based geology. Integration with metric imagery allows 3D photorealistic models to be created for interpretation, visualization and education. However, gaining meaningful results from lidar scans requires more than simply acquiring raw point data. Surveys require planning and, typically, a large amount of post-processing time. The contribution of this paper is to provide a more detailed insight into the technology, data collection and utilization techniques than is currently available. The paper focuses on the workflow for using lidar data, from the choice of field area and survey planning, to acquiring and processing data and, finally, extracting geologically useful data. Because manufacturer specifications for point precision are often optimistic when applied to real-world outcrops, the error sources associated with lidar data, and the implications of them propagating through the processing chain, are also discussed.

[1]  T. A. Ryer Deltaic Coals of Ferron Sandstone Member of Mancos Shale: Predictive Model for Cretaceous Coal-Bearing Strata of Western Interior , 1981 .

[2]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  B. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Global Positioning System , 1992 .

[4]  J. Stafleu,et al.  Outcrop topography as a proxy of acoustic impedance in synthetic seismograms , 1996 .

[5]  Clive S. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera self-calibration , 1997 .

[6]  E. J. Huising,et al.  Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications , 1998 .

[7]  J. Chandler Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research: Earth Surf , 1999 .

[8]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[9]  P. Wolf,et al.  Elements of Photogrammetry(with Applications in GIS) , 2000 .

[10]  E. Baltsavias,et al.  Digital Surface Modelling by Airborne Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetry for Glacier Monitoring , 2001 .

[11]  S. Slob,et al.  AN APPROACH TO AUTOMATE DISCONTINUITY MEASUREMENTS OF ROCK FACES USING LASER SCANNING TECHNIQUES , 2002 .

[12]  H. L. Mitchell,et al.  Integration, validation and point spacing optimisation of digital elevation models , 2004 .

[13]  P. Anderson,et al.  AAPG Studies in Geology No. 50, (Section Title: Regional Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretations) Chapter 8: Regional Stratigraphy of the Ferron Sandstone , 2004 .

[14]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  3D high-resolution digital models of outcrop analogue study sites to constrain reservoir model uncertainty: an example from Alport Castles, Derbyshire, UK , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[15]  R. D. Adams,et al.  Regional to Wellbore Analog for Fluvial-Deltaic Reservoir Modeling: The Ferron Sandstone of Utah , 2004 .

[16]  John P. Grotzinger,et al.  Digital characterization of thrombolite-stromatolite reef distribution in a carbonate ramp system (terminal Proterozoic, Nama Group, Namibia) , 2005 .

[17]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  CHANGE DETECTION ON POINTS CLOUD DATA ACQUIRED W ITH A GROUND LASER SCANNER , 2005 .

[18]  John B. Thurmond,et al.  Building simple multiscale visualizations of outcrop geology using virtual reality modeling language (VRML) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[19]  D. Petley,et al.  Combined Digital Photogrammetry and Time‐of‐Flight Laser Scanning for Monitoring Cliff Evolution , 2005 .

[20]  Allard W. Martinius,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of fluvial outcrop data for stochastic reservoir modelling , 2005, Petroleum Geoscience.

[21]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.

[22]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[23]  D. Lichti,et al.  Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners , 2006 .

[24]  R. Tenghamn PGS shows off electrical marine vibrator to capture ‘alternative’ seismic source market , 2006 .

[25]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: a review of the current state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[26]  John A. Howell,et al.  From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures , 2007 .

[27]  R. Jones,et al.  Characterisation of Fluvial Architectural Elements Using a Three Dimensional Outcrop Dataset – Escanilla Braided System , 2007 .

[28]  Evert Slob,et al.  Joint MSc programme in applied geophysics : a new concept in geophysics education , 2007 .

[29]  Richard R. Jones,et al.  Characterization of fluvial architectural elements using a three-dimensional outcrop data set: Escanilla braided system, South-Central Pyrenees, Spain , 2007 .

[30]  Amir Sagy,et al.  Evolution of fault-surface roughness with slip , 2007 .

[31]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Digital analysis brings renaissance for petroleum geology outcrop studies in North Africa , 2007 .