The filtered encounter: online dating and the problem of filtering through excessive information

Technologies are meant to enable us to contact more people, more often, and in this way “network” with others. Applied to dating, this would appear to be a good thing, as people would thereby benefit from having additional choice. However, the flip side of the coin is that because of the increased choice we get a case of too much information, too many choices, too many potential (and potentially unsatisfying) mates. We find in a qualitative study of online daters that filtering through the many options, partners and choices offered by online dating sites is a prime concern in online dating. Our aim in this paper is to characterize these filtering techniques, and also to discuss their potential social impact. We find that filtering begins at the initial screening process as daters try to “catch out” incongruous behaviour before investing too much energy in someone unsuitable. Participants quickly become increasingly technologically literate of the code-based features of the site in their quest for greater filtering efficiency. They also come to rely on the cultivation of their own filtering “instinct”. In the end, however, the prevalence and ongoing practice of filtering creates what can only be termed a shopping culture of dating, which often serves to sap the dating energies of participants.

[1]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Information Technologies , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[2]  M. Hardey Life beyond the Screen: Embodiment and Identity through the Internet: , 2002 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating , 2006 .

[4]  Jennifer Yurchisin,et al.  An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of internet dating , 2005 .

[5]  R. Barbrook CYBER-COMMUNISM: How the Americans are Superseding Capitalism in Cyberspace , 2000 .

[6]  R. Weiss Learning from strangers : the art and method of qualitative interview studies , 1995 .

[7]  Jeff Lewis From Culturalism to Transculturalism , 2002 .

[8]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[9]  Concealing screens: Consent, control and the desiring user , 2010 .

[10]  Michael W. Singletary Mass Communication Research: Contemporary Methods and Applications , 1993 .

[11]  Kirsty Best Living in the control society , 2010 .

[12]  R. Spears,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .

[13]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[14]  Mark Cenite Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 2000 .

[15]  David Scott Matchmaker, Matchmaker, Find Me a Mate: A Cultural Examination of a Virtual Community of Single Mormons , 2002 .

[16]  Deborah K. Padgett,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research , 2008 .

[17]  Rishab Aiyer Ghosh Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the Internet , 1998, First Monday.

[18]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC , 2003 .

[19]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Cyber-Flirting , 2003 .

[20]  M. Poster The Second Media Age , 1994 .

[21]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[22]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[23]  R. Ghosh Cooking pot markets: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the Internet , 1998, First Monday.

[24]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[25]  Alexander Galloway,et al.  Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization , 2001 .

[26]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[27]  Ian Shapiro,et al.  The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences , 2005 .

[28]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  What Makes You Click: An Empirical Analysis of Online Dating ⁄ , 2005 .

[29]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[30]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  People are experience goods: Improving online dating with virtual dates , 2008 .

[31]  Andrew T. Fiore,et al.  Romantic regressions : an analysis of behavior in online dating systems , 2004 .

[32]  Kirsty Best The Effects of Mediation? Beyond the Construction of Consent in the War on Terror , 2008 .

[33]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis , 2012 .

[34]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What Makes You Click? Mate Preferences and Matching Outcomes in Online Dating , 2006 .

[35]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..