Non-intrusive characterization of the redox potential of landfill leachate plumes from self-potential data.

Contaminant plumes (e.g., associated with leakages from municipal landfills) provide a source of natural electrical potentials (or "self-potentials") recordable at the Earth's surface. One contribution to these self-potentials is associated with pore water flow (i.e., the "streaming potential"), and the other is related to redox conditions. A contaminant plume can be regarded as a "geobattery": the source current potentially results from the degradation of the organic matter by micro-organisms, which produces electrons. These electrons are then carried by nanowires that connect bacteria and thorough metallic particles that precipitate in areas of strong redox potential gradient. In the case of the Entressen landfill (South of France), reported here, the hydraulic head differences measured in piezometers outside the contaminant plume is strongly linked to the surface self-potential signals, with a correlation coefficient of -0.94. We used a Bayesian method that combines hydraulic head and self-potential data collected outside the contaminated area to estimate the streaming potential component of the collected self-potential data. Once the streaming potential contribution was removed from the measured self-potentials, the correlation coefficient between the residual self-potentials and the measured redox potentials in the aquifer was 0.92. The slope of this regression curve was close to 0.5, which was fairly consistent with both finite element modelling and the proposed geobattery model.

[1]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 2. Theory and application to geothermal systems , 1999 .

[2]  N. Linde,et al.  Chemico-electromechanical coupling in microporous media. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  P. Möller,et al.  The relation between electric and redox potential: evidence from laboratory and field measurements , 2001 .

[4]  V. Naudet,et al.  A sandbox experiment to investigate bacteria‐mediated redox processes on self‐potential signals , 2005 .

[5]  A. Green,et al.  Self‐Potential Image Reconstruction: Capabilities and Limitations , 1997 .

[6]  André Revil,et al.  Principles of electrography applied to self‐potential electrokinetic sources and hydrogeological applications , 2003 .

[7]  W. R. Fischer,et al.  Redox: Fundamentals, Processes and Applications , 1999 .

[8]  G. Constantinides,et al.  Visualization experiments of biodegradation in porous media and calculation of the biodegradation rate , 2002 .

[9]  M. Weigel Self-potential surveys on waste dumps theory and practice , 1989 .

[10]  J. Avouac,et al.  Radon emanation and electric potential variations associated with transient deformation near reservoir lakes , 1999, Nature.

[11]  Salvatore Straface,et al.  Self‐potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments , 2004 .

[12]  R M Atlas,et al.  Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective , 1981, Microbiological reviews.

[13]  Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen,et al.  Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminant plumes , 2000 .

[14]  G. Heron,et al.  Biogeochemistry of landfill leachate plumes , 2001 .

[15]  André Revil,et al.  Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations , 2004 .

[16]  Harold M. Mooney,et al.  THE ELECTROCHEMICAL MECHANISM OF SULFIDE SELF-POTENTIALS* , 1960 .

[17]  C. Doussan,et al.  Streaming current generation in two‐phase flow conditions , 2007 .

[18]  Philippe Ackerer,et al.  Detection of advected, reacting redox fronts from self-potential measurements. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[19]  E. Grabner,et al.  The Geobattery model : a contribution to large scale electrochemistry , 1997 .

[20]  Philippe Ackerer,et al.  Detection of advected concentration and pH fronts from self-potential measurements , 2005 .

[21]  Jonathan E. Nyquist,et al.  TutorialSelf-potential: The ugly duckling of environmental geophysics , 2002 .

[22]  T. Mehta,et al.  Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires , 2005, Nature.

[23]  A. Revil,et al.  Tomography of self‐potential anomalies of electrochemical nature , 2001 .

[24]  M. Aubert,et al.  Self‐Potential Method in Hydrogeological Exploration of Volcanic Areas , 1996 .

[25]  M. Voltz,et al.  Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self‐potential method , 2006 .

[26]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Estimating the hydraulic conductivity at the south oyster site from geophysical tomographic data using Bayesian Techniques based on the normal linear regression model , 2001 .

[27]  André Revil,et al.  Relationship between self‐potential (SP) signals and redox conditions in contaminated groundwater , 2003 .

[28]  Claude Fournier,et al.  Spontaneous potentials and resistivity surveys applied to hydrogeology in a volcanic area: case history of the Chaîne des Puys (Puy-de-Dôme, France) , 1989 .

[29]  Niklas Linde,et al.  Estimation of the water table throughout a catchment using self-potential and piezometric data in a Bayesian framework , 2007 .

[30]  G. Buselli,et al.  Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods , 2001 .

[31]  Y. Ilyin,et al.  Electrokinetic spontaneous polarization in porous media: petrophysics and numerical modelling , 2002 .

[32]  Robin E. Nimmer Direct current and self-potential monitoring of an evolving plume in partially saturated fractured rock , 2002 .

[33]  Derek R. Lovley,et al.  Geobacter metallireducens accesses insoluble Fe(iii) oxide by chemotaxis , 2002, Nature.

[34]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils , 2002 .