Research Framework of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing: A Case of Fused Deposition Modeling

Additive manufacturing (AM) has taken off for a steadily fast development, as it enables design flexibility and capability of increasingly complex, highly personalized products with enhanced performance and functionality. More importantly, it is claimed to hold great potentials in improving sustainability. However, how to fulfill such potentials is weakly supported by the scattered research. To better outline, connect, and coordinate the efforts toward a sustainable future of additive manufacturing, a research framework with six successive parts is proposed. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a relatively mature and widely applied process. Considering its scale, the sustainability issues in FDM are first attended. To demonstrate how the proposed research framework is utilized, a life cycle energy analysis of FDM processes has been conducted, including filament production, FDM printing, post-processing, and auxiliary services. Three research projects are presented and performed with the guidance of research framework. The common motivation is to understand the energy characteristics, key influential factors, and energy-saving opportunities in the FDM printing processes. The topics are (1) how the key parameters influence the process energy consumption; (2) the relation between energy consumption and surface roughness using different printers; and (3) how to minimize the overall printing time, correspondingly printing energy, of a multi-component complex part. It is hoped that with the proposed research framework, the future studies on sustainability in additive manufacturing can be consistent and comparable, and the data integration and cross-disciplinary data analysis can be facilitated.

[1]  S. Arunachalam,et al.  Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling , 2001 .

[2]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: Methodology description , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Richard M. Everson,et al.  A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing , 2013 .

[4]  Rudolph F. Laubscher,et al.  Recent developments in sustainable manufacturing of gears: a review , 2016 .

[5]  Joseph Pegna,et al.  Environmental impacts of rapid prototyping: an overview of research to date , 2006 .

[6]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling , 2010 .

[7]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[8]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives , 2005 .

[9]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling , 2003 .

[10]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Roughness prediction in coupled operations of fused deposition modeling and barrel finishing , 2015 .

[11]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Surface Characterization in Fused Deposition Modeling , 2014 .

[12]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[13]  Massimo Martorelli,et al.  Surface roughness visualisation for rapid prototyping models , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Xiaolong Zhang,et al.  Medial axis tree - an internal supporting structure for 3D printing , 2015, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[15]  Antreas Kantaros,et al.  Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process , 2013 .

[16]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) Part 1: Methodology Description , 2011 .

[17]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling , 2016 .

[18]  Jianhua Mo,et al.  Sloping wall structure support generation for fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[19]  Daniel R. Cooper,et al.  Note on the Rate and Energy Efficiency Limits for Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[20]  Tao Peng,et al.  Analysis of Energy Utilization in 3D Printing Processes , 2016 .

[21]  Yong Huang,et al.  Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations , 2015 .

[22]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology , 2002 .

[23]  Neil Hopkinson,et al.  Rapid manufacturing : an industrial revolution for the digital age , 2006 .

[24]  Tao Peng,et al.  Energy modelling for FDM 3D printing from a life cycle perspective , 2017, Int. J. Manuf. Res..

[25]  Pascal Mognol,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing , 2013, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[26]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight , 2006 .

[27]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology, Second Edition , 2011 .

[28]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Precision and Energy Usage for Additive Manufacturing , 2013 .

[29]  Jeffrey B Dahmus,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of resources used in manufacturing processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling , 2004 .