Transcatheter Mitral‐Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND Among patients with heart failure who have mitral regurgitation due to left ventricular dysfunction, the prognosis is poor. Transcatheter mitral‐valve repair may improve their clinical outcomes. METHODS At 78 sites in the United States and Canada, we enrolled patients with heart failure and moderate‐to‐severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation who remained symptomatic despite the use of maximal doses of guideline‐directed medical therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to transcatheter mitral‐valve repair plus medical therapy (device group) or medical therapy alone (control group). The primary effectiveness end point was all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow‐up. The primary safety end point was freedom from device‐related complications at 12 months; the rate for this end point was compared with a prespecified objective performance goal of 88.0%. RESULTS Of the 614 patients who were enrolled in the trial, 302 were assigned to the device group and 312 to the control group. The annualized rate of all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months was 35.8% per patient‐year in the device group as compared with 67.9% per patient‐year in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.001). The rate of freedom from device‐related complications at 12 months was 96.6% (lower 95% confidence limit, 94.8%; P<0.001 for comparison with the performance goal). Death from any cause within 24 months occurred in 29.1% of the patients in the device group as compared with 46.1% in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.82; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with heart failure and moderate‐to‐severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation who remained symptomatic despite the use of maximal doses of guideline‐directed medical therapy, transcatheter mitral‐valve repair resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure and lower all‐cause mortality within 24 months of follow‐up than medical therapy alone. The rate of freedom from device‐related complications exceeded a prespecified safety threshold. (Funded by Abbott; COAPT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01626079.)

[1]  M. Mack,et al.  Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Design and rationale of the COAPT trial , 2018, American heart journal.

[2]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  [2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease]. , 2017, Kardiologia polska.

[3]  J. Mascherbauer,et al.  Refining the prognostic impact of functional mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure , 2017, European heart journal.

[4]  Saibal Kar,et al.  Outcomes With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in the United States: An STS/ACC TVT Registry Report. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  A. Sannino,et al.  Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[6]  Gerasimos S Filippatos,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Gerasimos S Filippatos,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. , 2017, Journal of cardiac failure.

[9]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Circulation.

[10]  P. Boekstegers,et al.  One-year outcomes and predictors of mortality after MitraClip therapy in contemporary clinical practice: results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions registry , 2015, European heart journal.

[11]  Francois Dagenais,et al.  Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Filippatos,et al.  Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 2: endpoint definitions: A consensus document from the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium. , 2015, European heart journal.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Clinical trial design principles and endpoint definitions for transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement: part 1: clinical trial design principles: A consensus document from the mitral valve academic research consortium. , 2015, European heart journal.

[14]  M. Mack,et al.  Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic considerations. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients: results of the EVEREST II study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Mack,et al.  Improved functional status and quality of life in prohibitive surgical risk patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation after transcatheter mitral valve repair. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  N. Smedira,et al.  Prevalence and outcomes of unoperated patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation and heart failure: comprehensive analysis to determine the potential role of MitraClip for this unmet need. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  J. Hausleiter,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Little,et al.  The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Jennifer Taylor,et al.  ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[21]  Saibal Kar,et al.  Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  E. Foster,et al.  Quantitative assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation by serial echocardiography in a multicenter clinical trial of percutaneous mitral valve repair. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  John P Klein,et al.  Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Echocardiographic guidance and assessment of percutaneous repair for mitral regurgitation with the Evalve MitraClip: lessons learned from EVEREST I. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[25]  Virginie Rondeau,et al.  Joint frailty models for recurring events and death using maximum penalized likelihood estimation: application on cancer events. , 2006 .

[26]  R. Levine,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.