Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany.

BACKGROUND Much has been written lately regarding hospitalisations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSH) and their strengths and weaknesses as a quality management indicator. The idea underlying ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) is that effective treatment of acute conditions, good management of chronic illnesses and immunisation against infectious diseases can reduce the risk of a specified set of hospitalisations. METHODS The present paper applies group consensus methods to synthesise available evidence with expert opinion, thus identifying relevant ACSC. It contributes to the literature by evaluating the degree of preventability of ACSH and surveying the medical and systemic changes needed to increase quality for each diagnosis group. Forty physicians proportionally selected from all medical disciplines relevant to the treatment of ACSC participated in the three round Delphi survey. The setting of the study is Germany. RESULTS The proposed core list is a subset of 22 ACSC diagnosis groups, covering 90% of all consented ACSH and conditions with a higher than 85% estimated degree of preventability. Of all 18.6 million German hospital cases in the year 2012, the panelists considered 5.04 million hospitalisations (27%) to be sensitive to ambulatory care, of which 3.72 (20%) were estimated to be actually preventable. If only emergencies are considered, the ACSH share reduces to less than 8%. The geographic distribution of ACSH indicates significant regional variation with particularly high rates and potential for improvement in the North Rhine region, in Thuringia, Saxony-Anhalt, northern and eastern Bavaria and the Saarland. The average degree of preventability was 75% across all diagnosis groups. By far the most often mentioned strategy for reducing ACSH was 'improving continuous care'. CONCLUSION There are several good reasons why process indicators prevail in the assessment of ambulatory care. ACSH rates can however provide a more complete picture by adding useful information related to the overall patient outcome. The results of our analysis should be used to encourage debate and as a basis for further confirmatory work.

[1]  R. Barnett,et al.  Practice and ethnic variations in avoidable hospital admission rates in Christchurch, New Zealand. , 2010, Health & place.

[2]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  J. Glover,et al.  Atlas of Avoidable Hospitalisations in Australia: ambulatory care-sensitive conditions , 2007 .

[4]  B. Starfield,et al.  The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. , 2004, European journal of public health.

[5]  J. Macinko,et al.  [Ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations: elaboration of Brazilian list as a tool for measuring health system performance (Project ICSAP--Brazil)]. , 2009, Cadernos de saude publica.

[6]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The quality of care and the quality of measuring it. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Aaron J. Trachtenberg,et al.  Inequities in Ambulatory Care and the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Respiratory Hospitalizations: A Population-Based Study of a Canadian City , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[8]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Emergency admissions for coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study of general practice, population and hospital factors in England. , 2011, Public health.

[9]  R. Brook,et al.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[10]  T S Carey,et al.  Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. , 1993, Health affairs.

[11]  L. Sundmacher,et al.  Ambulant-sensitive Krankenhausfälle: Eine inter­nationale Übersicht mit Schlussfolgerungen für einen deutschen Katalog , 2014 .

[12]  H. Gravelle,et al.  Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  L. Sundmacher,et al.  The impact of office-based care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions , 2015, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[14]  K E Peterson,et al.  The Minnesota project: a focused approach to ambulatory quality assessment. , 1990, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[15]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  Preventable hospital admissions among the homeless in California: A retrospective analysis of care for ambulatory care sensitive conditions , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  R. Mcdermott,et al.  A systematic review of evidence on the association between hospitalisation for chronic disease related ambulatory care sensitive conditions and primary health care resourcing , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[18]  A. Busato,et al.  Avoidable hospitalizations in Switzerland: a small area analysis on regional variation, density of physicians, hospital supply and rurality , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[19]  M. Faber,et al.  Organizational aspects of primary care related to avoidable hospitalization: a systematic review. , 2014, Family practice.

[20]  Martin Roland,et al.  Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  C Gatsonis,et al.  Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. , 1992, JAMA.

[22]  T. Freund,et al.  Strategies for Reducing Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[23]  I. Kawachi,et al.  Why do Americans have shorter life expectancy and worse health than do people in other high-income countries? , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[24]  Maria Elmira Alfradique,et al.  Internações por condições sensíveis à atenção primária: a construção da lista brasileira como ferramenta para medir o desempenho do sistema de saúde (Projeto ICSAP - Brasil) , 2009 .

[25]  Irene Papanicolas,et al.  Performance measurement for health system improvement : experiences, challenges and prospects , 2010 .

[26]  G. Morgan,et al.  Frequent hospital admission of older people with chronic disease: a cross-sectional survey with telephone follow-up and data linkage , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[27]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. , 2009, Public health.

[28]  J. Vandergrift,et al.  Association between imposition of a Maintenance of Certification requirement and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations and health care costs. , 2014, JAMA.

[29]  K. Boockvar,et al.  Potentially preventable hospitalizations among older adults with diabetes. , 2011, American Journal of Managed Care.

[30]  R H Brook,et al.  Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[31]  C. Sanderson,et al.  Conditions for Which Onset or Hospital Admission is Potentially Preventable by Timely and Effective Ambulatory Care , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[32]  John F. Hurdle,et al.  Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. , 2005, Health services research.

[33]  F. McAlister,et al.  Relationship between primary care physician visits and hospital/emergency use for uncomplicated hypertension, an ambulatory care-sensitive condition. , 2014, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[34]  N. Hicks,et al.  Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care , 1994, BMJ.

[35]  M. Brownell,et al.  Hospitalisation rates for ambulatory care sensitive conditions for persons with and without an intellectual disability--a population perspective. , 2010, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[36]  Zahid Ansari,et al.  Access to Health Care and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions , 2006, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[37]  L. Sundmacher,et al.  Ambulant-sensitive Krankenhausfälle: Eine inter nationale Übersicht mit Schlussfolgerungen für einen deutschen Katalog Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions: An International Overview with Conclusions for a German Catalogue , 2015 .

[38]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions: A Method for Comparative Access and Quality Studies Using Routinely Collected Statistics , 2001, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[39]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Interventions to reduce unplanned hospital admission: a series of systematic reviews , 2012 .

[40]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[41]  Michael Millman,et al.  Access to Health Care in America , 1993 .

[42]  Andrew Ward,et al.  Disparities in Potentially Avoidable Emergency Department (ED) Care: ED Visits for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions , 2012, Medical care.