Comparison of mechanical properties of silicone and PVC (polyvinylchloride) cosmetic gloves for articulating hand prostheses.

Current articulating electric and body-powered hands have a lower pinch force (15-34 N) than electric hands with stiff fingers (55-100 N). The cosmetic glove, which covers a hand prosthesis, negatively affects the mechanical efficiency of a prosthesis. The goal of this study is to mechanically compare polyvinylchloride (PVC) and silicone cosmetic gloves and quantify the stiffness of the finger joints, the required actuation energy, and the energy dissipation during joint articulation. Six cosmetic gloves, identical in size but made from different materials, were mechanically tested: three PVC and three silicone. The silicone gloves required less work and dissipated less energy during flexing. They also had a lower joint stiffness and required a lower maximum joint torque. Based on energy requirements, joint stiffness, and required joint torque, the tested silicone glove is most suitable for application on an articulating hand prosthesis.

[1]  W B Douglas,et al.  A cosmetic functional hand incorporating a silicone rubber cosmetic glove , 1977, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  J. Herder Design of spring force compensation systems , 1998 .

[3]  J. C. Cool,et al.  Methods for reducing energy dissipation in cosmetic gloves. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  D. H. Plettenburg Basic requirements for upper extremity prostheses: the WILMER approach , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[5]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[6]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  C. Pylatiuk,et al.  Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  C. K. van der Sluis,et al.  The i-LIMB Hand and the DMC Plus Hand Compared: A Case Report , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.