Prevalence of regional myocardial thinning and relationship with myocardial scarring in patients with coronary artery disease.

IMPORTANCE Regional left ventricular (LV) wall thinning is believed to represent chronic transmural myocardial infarction and scar tissue. However, recent case reports using delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging raise the possibility that thinning may occur with little or no scarring. OBJECTIVE To evaluate patients with regional myocardial wall thinning and to determine scar burden and potential for functional improvement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Investigator-initiated, prospective, 3-center study conducted from August 2000 through January 2008 in 3 parts to determine (1) in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CMR viability assessment, the prevalence of regional wall thinning (end-diastolic wall thickness ≤5.5 mm), (2) in patients with thinning, the presence and extent of scar burden, and (3) in patients with thinning undergoing coronary revascularization, any changes in myocardial morphology and contractility. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Scar burden in thinned regions assessed using delayed-enhancement CMR and changes in myocardial morphology and function assessed using cine-CMR after revascularization. RESULTS Of 1055 consecutive patients with CAD screened, 201 (19% [95% CI, 17% to 21%]) had regional wall thinning. Wall thinning spanned a mean of 34% (95% CI, 32% to 37% [SD, 15%]) of LV surface area. Within these regions, the extent of scarring was 72% (95% CI, 69% to 76% [SD, 25%]); however, 18% (95% CI, 13% to 24%) of thinned regions had limited scar burden (≤50% of total extent). Among patients with thinning undergoing revascularization and follow-up cine-CMR (n = 42), scar extent within the thinned region was inversely related to regional (r = -0.72, P < .001) and global (r = -0.53, P < .001) contractile improvement. End-diastolic wall thickness in thinned regions with limited scar burden increased from 4.4 mm (95% CI, 4.1 to 4.7) to 7.5 mm (95% CI, 6.9 to 8.1) after revascularization (P < .001), resulting in resolution of wall thinning. On multivariable analysis, scar extent had the strongest association with contractile improvement (slope coefficient, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02]; P < .001) and reversal of thinning (slope coefficient, -0.05 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.04]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with CAD referred for CMR and found to have regional wall thinning, limited scar burden was present in 18% and was associated with improved contractility and resolution of wall thinning after revascularization. These findings, which are not consistent with common assumptions, warrant further investigation.

[1]  L. W. Eaton,et al.  Expansion of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Its Relationship to Infarct Morphology in a Canine Model , 1981, Circulation research.

[2]  C J Slager,et al.  Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. , 1995, Circulation.

[3]  H. Weisman,et al.  Myocardial infarct expansion, infarct extension, and reinfarction: pathophysiologic concepts. , 1987, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[4]  M. Verani,et al.  End-diastolic wall thickness as a predictor of recovery of function in myocardial hibernation: relation to rest-redistribution T1-201 tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of non-invasive tests, singly and in combination, for diagnosis of hibernating myocardium. , 2000, European heart journal.

[6]  G S Wagner,et al.  The Selvester QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. The development and application of the system. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  D. David Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  E. Voth,et al.  F-18-FDG uptake is a reliable predictory of functional recovery of akinetic but viable infarct regions as defined by magnetic resonance imaging before and after revascularization. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  B. Gersh,et al.  Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J S Hochman,et al.  Expansion of acute myocardial infarction: an experimental study. , 1982, Circulation.

[11]  Maarten L. Simoons,et al.  The third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013 .

[12]  E. Erdmann,et al.  Dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging predicts contractile recovery of chronically dysfunctional myocardium after successful revascularization. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  2013 American Medical Association . All rights reserved . , 2013 .

[14]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2002, Hypertension.

[15]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Infarct expansion: pathologic analysis of 204 patients with a single myocardial infarct. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R. Kim,et al.  Fundamental concepts in myocardial viability assessment revisited: when knowing how much is “alive” is not enough , 2004, Heart.

[18]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[19]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Infarct expansion versus extension: two different complications of acute myocardial infarction. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  J. Neaton,et al.  Unrecognized myocardial infarction: experience in the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT) , 1987, Circulation.

[21]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[22]  D. Berman,et al.  Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Alpert,et al.  Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .

[24]  A. Neskovic,et al.  Left Ventricular Remodeling After Primary Coronary Angioplasty , 2002 .

[25]  Dipan J. Shah,et al.  Gadolinium Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Predicts Reversible Myocardial Dysfunction and Remodeling in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing &bgr;-Blocker Therapy , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Opposite Patterns of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Role of Myocardial Viability , 2004, Circulation.

[27]  Richard D. White,et al.  Nonstress delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging of the myocardium predicts improvement of function after revascularization for chronic ischemic heart disease with left ventricular dysfunction. , 2003, American heart journal.

[28]  Douglas Weaver,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, Circulation.

[29]  D. Pennell,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Reversible wall thinning in hibernation predicted by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2005, Circulation.

[30]  G. Alunni,et al.  Patients with hibernating myocardium show altered left ventricular volumes and shape, which revert after revascularization: evidence that dyssynergy might directly induce cardiac remodeling. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  D. Pennell,et al.  Reversible Wall Thinning in Hibernation Predicted by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2005 .

[32]  M. Cohen,et al.  Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  G. Lamas,et al.  Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[34]  Wolfgang G Rehwald,et al.  Infarct resorption, compensatory hypertrophy, and differing patterns of ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarctions of varying size. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Clinical relevance of hibernating myocardium in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[36]  M. Weisfeldt,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of myocardial infarct expansion. , 1988, Circulation.