np1: A computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials

The continual reassessment method is a recommended dose escalation design for including patients in phase I clinical trials designed to estimate the maximum tolerated dose. However, for a particular trial, the implementation of these methods requires extensive computer programming. Standard 3+3 designs do not require this, but have shown to possess poor statistical properties. np1 is a user friendly computer program which has implemented two continual reassessment methods for simulating and conducting a phase I clinical trial. Several options allow the user to investigate operating characteristics under various scenarios.

[1]  Xavier Paoletti,et al.  Design efficiency in dose finding studies , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[2]  Ethan Reiner,et al.  Operating characteristics of the standard phase I clinical trial design , 1999 .

[3]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach. , 1996, Biometrics.

[4]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Non-parametric optimal design in dose finding studies. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  M. Christian,et al.  Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  S. Goodman,et al.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  T A Gooley,et al.  Simulation as a design tool for phase I/II clinical trials: an example from bone marrow transplantation. , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[9]  Elkan F Halpern,et al.  Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. , 2004, JAMA.

[10]  S. Møller,et al.  An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  S. Mineishi,et al.  A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  W J Shih,et al.  Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials. , 2001, Biostatistics.

[13]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.

[14]  A Kramar,et al.  Continual reassessment methods in phase I trials of the combination of two drugs in oncology. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  J M Collins,et al.  Innovations in phase 1 trial design: where do we go next? , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[16]  Ethan Reiner,et al.  A stopping rule for the continual reassessment method , 1998 .

[17]  P F Thall,et al.  Accrual strategies for phase I trials with delayed patient outcome. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  D. Faries,et al.  Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials. , 1994, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[19]  B E Storer,et al.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. , 1989, Biometrics.