Mitigation Control of Critical Faults in Production Systems

The inherent complexity of critical production systems, coupled with policies to preserve people´s safety and health, environmental management, and the facilities themselves, and stricter laws regarding the occurrence of accidents, are the motivation to the design of Safety Control Systems that leads the mitigation functionality. According to experts, the concept of Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) is a solution to these types of issues. They strongly recommend layers of risk reduction based on hierarchical control systems in order to manage risks, preventing or mitigating faults, and to lead the process to a safe state. Additionally some of the safety standards such as IEC 61508, IEC 61511, among others, guide different activities related Safety Life Cycle design of SIS. The IEC 61508 suggests layers of critical fault prevention and critical fault mitigation. In the context of mitigation control system, the standard provides a recommendation of activities to mitigate critical faults, by proposing control levels of mitigation. This paper proposes a method to implement the mitigation layer based on the risk analysis of the plant and the consequences of faults of its critical components. The control architecture, based on distributed and hierarchical control systems in a collaborative way, will make use of the techniques of risk analysis raised and mitigation actions, based on the knowledge of an expert, implemented by fuzzy logic.

[1]  D.D. Popa,et al.  A PI-Fuzzy controller designated for industrial motor control applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Ching-Han Chen,et al.  Design and high-level synthesis of hybrid controller , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2004.

[3]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Bibliographical review on reconfigurable fault-tolerant control systems , 2003, Annu. Rev. Control..

[4]  Reinaldo Squillante Júnior,et al.  MATHEMATICAL METHOD FOR MODELING AND VALIDATING OF SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEM DESIGNED ACCORDING TO IEC 61508 AND IEC 61511 , 2012 .

[5]  Mohammad Modarres Reliability engineering and risk analysis , 1999 .

[6]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Architectural constraints in IEC 61508: Do they have the intended effect? , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Paulo E. Miyagi,et al.  Design of Supervisory Control System for Ventricular Assist Device , 2011, DoCEIS.

[8]  Luis M. Camarinha-Matos,et al.  Technological Innovation for the Internet of Things , 2013, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[9]  Evandro Abreu de Souza O treinamento industrial e a gerencia de riscos - uma proposta de instrução programada , 1995 .

[10]  Lifeng Xi,et al.  Service-oriented communication architecture for automated manufacturing system integration , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[11]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  A Fuzzy Probabilistic Approach for Determining Safety Integrity Level , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[12]  Angela E Summers,et al.  Common cause and common sense, designing failure out of your safety instrumented systems (SIS) ☆ , 1999 .

[13]  Paulo E. Miyagi,et al.  Safety in Supervisory Control for Critical Systems , 2013, DoCEIS.

[14]  R. Bell,et al.  IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programme electronic safety-related systems: overview , 1999 .

[15]  Luis M. Camarinha-Matos,et al.  Technological Innovation for Sustainability - Second IFIP WG 5.5/SOCOLNET Doctoral Conference on Computing, Electrical and Industrial Systems, DoCEIS 2011, Costa de Caparica, Portugal, February 21-23, 2011. Proceedings , 2011, DoCEIS.