Building alliances with industrial designers offers health innovators a unique pathway to create new modes to serve their patients. Cross-pollination of ideas from the earliest stages of development in interdisciplinary research and development teams including major stakeholders and designers can lead to more meaningful and impactful innovations.A shift in future healthcare from cure to prevention will rely more heavily upon the individual. The home environment will house consumer medical devices that will carry out basic monitoring of the individual. While technologies are currently being developed to support this trend, there is a gulf that exists between the often-complex interfaces required by the highly specific functionality of products and the emotional needs of the target user. If a target user 'feels' a product was designed 'just for them' they are more likely to develop an emotional bond with that product. This manifests itself in the user engaging and interacting with the product. If a product, regardless of its high functionality, does not resonate with the user, this tends to result in product underuse, misuse and possible abandonment. When those products are related to a course of medical rehabilitation or treatment, these results could be translated to 'more compliant' and 'less compliant' and ultimately can impact upon how a person heals.Industrial designers focus on ensuring that both the functional and emotional needs of mainstream users as well as technical-expert-users are met. Design research provides the opportunity to bridge the gap between the functional requirements and the less tangible unmet needs of the user by exploring authentic human behaviour.This paper presents case studies of collaborative, interdisciplinary teams employing human-centred design and empathic research strategies (incorporating shared language, collaboration, ethnography, empathy and empathic modelling) to create real solutions that are responding to real needs of real users.The future is interdisciplinary. The future is bright.
[1]
D. McDonagh,et al.
Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation
,
2010
.
[2]
Noemi Bitterman,et al.
Design of medical devices--a home perspective.
,
2011,
European journal of internal medicine.
[3]
B. Lutz,et al.
Disability in Everyday Life
,
2005,
Qualitative health research.
[4]
Jonathan Littman,et al.
The Ten Faces of Innovation
,
2005
.
[5]
Brenda Laurel,et al.
Design Research: Methods and Perspectives
,
2003
.
[6]
C. Philo,et al.
THE NORMALITY OF DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY: BODIES, SPACES AND DISABILITY GEOGRAPHY
,
2007
.
[7]
Jennifer Visocky O'Grady,et al.
A Designer's Research Manual: Succeed in Design by Knowing Your Clients and What They Really Need
,
2006
.
[8]
D. Bates,et al.
The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home.
,
2010,
Health affairs.
[9]
T. Mackey,et al.
Quality and safety in medical care: what does the future hold?
,
2011,
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[10]
Simeon Keates,et al.
Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population
,
2003
.
[11]
Megan Strickfaden,et al.
Empathic design research: Moving towards a new mode of industrial design education
,
2011
.
[12]
T. Mcdaniel,et al.
Review of A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future
,
2008
.
[13]
A. Darkins,et al.
E-patient Connectivity and the Near Term Future
,
2011,
Journal of General Internal Medicine.