Negative soil moisture-precipitation feedback in dry and wet regions

Soil moisture-precipitation (SM-P) feedback significantly influences the terrestrial water and energy cycles. However, the sign of the feedback and the associated physical mechanism have been debated, leaving a research gap regarding global water and climate changes. Based on Koster’s framework, we estimate SM-P feedback using satellite remote sensing and ground observation data sets. Methodologically, the sign of the feedback is identified by the correlation between monthly soil moisture and next-month precipitation. The physical mechanism is investigated through coupling precipitation and soil moisture (P-SM), soil moisture ad evapotranspiration (SM-E) and evapotranspiration and precipitation (E-P) correlations. Our results demonstrate that although positive SM-P feedback is predominant over land, non-negligible negative feedback occurs in dry and wet regions. Specifically, 43.75% and 40.16% of the negative feedback occurs in the arid and humid climate zones. Physically, negative SM-P feedback depends on the SM-E correlation. In dry regions, evapotranspiration change is soil moisture limited. In wet regions, evapotranspiration change is energy limited. We conclude that the complex SM-E correlation results in negative SM-P feedback in dry and wet regions, and the cause varies based on the environmental and climatic conditions.

[1]  Christa D. Peters-Lidard,et al.  Diagnosing the Sensitivity of Local Land–Atmosphere Coupling via the Soil Moisture–Boundary Layer Interaction , 2011 .

[2]  Paul R. Houser,et al.  Assessing a Satellite-Era Perspective of the Global Water Cycle , 2007 .

[3]  P. Rasch,et al.  Increasing water cycle extremes in California and in relation to ENSO cycle under global warming , 2015, Nature Communications.

[4]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  A Soil Moisture–Rainfall Feedback Mechanism: 2. Numerical experiments , 1998 .

[5]  C. Taylor,et al.  Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Steven M. Quiring,et al.  Does Afternoon Precipitation Occur Preferentially over Dry or Wet Soils in Oklahoma , 2015 .

[7]  T. McMahon,et al.  Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2007 .

[8]  B. Cook,et al.  Soil Moisture Feedbacks to Precipitation in Southern Africa , 2006 .

[9]  A. James,et al.  Antecedent moisture conditions and catchment morphology as controls on spatial patterns of runoff generation in small forest catchments , 2009 .

[10]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Probability of afternoon precipitation in eastern United States and Mexico enhanced by high evaporation , 2011 .

[11]  E. Vivoni,et al.  Observed relation between evapotranspiration and soil moisture in the North American monsoon region , 2008 .

[12]  J. Klomp,et al.  A review and synthesis , 2010 .

[13]  Xiahong Feng,et al.  The effect of soil hydrology on the oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions of plants’ source water , 2001 .

[14]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land , 2014 .

[15]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  A Soil Moisture–Rainfall Feedback Mechanism: 1. Theory and observations , 1998 .

[16]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The Soil Moisture–Precipitation Feedback in Simulations with Explicit and Parameterized Convection , 2009 .

[17]  Bin Zou,et al.  High-Resolution Satellite Mapping of Fine Particulates Based on Geographically Weighted Regression , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  T. Huntington.  Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis , 2006 .

[19]  Neng Wan,et al.  Land Use Regression Modeling of PM2.5 Concentrations at Optimized Spatial Scales , 2016 .

[20]  A. Rapp,et al.  Soil moisture–precipitation coupling: observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet and underlying physical mechanisms , 2015 .

[21]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[23]  M. Wei,et al.  A slow slip event in the south central Alaska Subduction Zone and related seismicity anomaly , 2012 .

[24]  Ranz,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated — Source link , 2006 .

[25]  Bin Zou,et al.  An optimized spatial proximity model for fine particulate matter air pollution exposure assessment in areas of sparse monitoring , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  An analysis of the soil moisture‐rainfall feedback, based on direct observations from Illinois , 1997 .

[27]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.

[28]  Xiaoping Liu,et al.  Satellite-based ground PM 2.5 estimation using timely structure adaptive modeling , 2016 .

[29]  G. Salvucci,et al.  Empirical evidence of contrasting soil moisture–precipitation feedbacks across the United States , 2016, Science.

[30]  D. Heslop,et al.  Soil moisture balance and magnetic enhancement in loess-paleosol sequences from the Tibetan Plateau and Chinese Loess Plateau , 2015 .

[31]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  Dissecting soil moisture‐precipitation coupling , 2012 .

[32]  R. Koster,et al.  Observational evidence that soil moisture variations affect precipitation , 2003 .

[33]  P. Younger.  Water in the balance , 2013 .

[34]  Diego G. Miralles,et al.  Reconciling spatial and temporal soil moisture effects on afternoon rainfall , 2015, Nature Communications.

[35]  S. Schubert,et al.  Impacts of Local Soil Moisture Anomalies on the Atmospheric Circulation and on Remote Surface Meteorological Fields during Boreal Summer: A Comprehensive Analysis over North America , 2016 .

[36]  J. Overpeck.  Climate science: The challenge of hot drought , 2013, Nature.

[37]  M. Rodell,et al.  Water in the Balance , 2013, Science.

[38]  G. McCabe,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of the global water balance , 2013, Climatic Change.

[39]  S. Peng,et al.  Estimation of annual potential evapotranspiration at regional scale based on the effect of moisture on soil respiration. , 2010 .

[40]  Dagang Wang,et al.  Quantifying the Strength of Soil Moisture–Precipitation Coupling and Its Sensitivity to Changes in Surface Water Budget , 2007 .

[41]  J. Boé.  Modulation of soil moisture–precipitation interactions over France by large scale circulation , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[42]  Kevin Bowman,et al.  Importance of rain evaporation and continental convection in the tropical water cycle , 2007, Nature.

[43]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations , 2011 .

[44]  Oliver L. Phillips,et al.  Intensification of the Amazon hydrological cycle over the last two decades , 2013 .

[45]  S. Wijffels,et al.  Ocean Salinities Reveal Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification During 1950 to 2000 , 2012, Science.

[46]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A Negative Soil Moisture-Precipitation Relationship and Its Causes , 2008 .

[47]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  Observed Soil Moisture–Precipitation Feedback in Illinois: A Systematic Analysis over Different Scales , 2016 .

[48]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Contributions of soil moisture interactions to climate change in the tropics in the GLACE–CMIP5 experiment , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[49]  W. Wagner,et al.  Soil as a natural rain gauge: Estimating global rainfall from satellite soil moisture data , 2014 .

[50]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[51]  Huihui Feng,et al.  Global land moisture trends: drier in dry and wetter in wet over land , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Huihui Feng,et al.  Combined effects of precipitation and air temperature on soil moisture in different land covers in a humid basin , 2015 .

[53]  U. Schneider,et al.  GPCC's new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[54]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[55]  S. J. Birks,et al.  Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration , 2013, Nature.

[56]  W. Wagner,et al.  Evaluation of the ESA CCI soil moisture product using ground-based observations , 2015 .

[57]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  Atmospheric Controls on Soil Moisture-Boundary Layer Interactions. Part II: Feedbacks within the Continental United States , 2003 .

[58]  R. Hochberg,et al.  Iodine-125--labeled estradiol: a gamma-emitting analog of estradiol that binds to the estrogen receptor. , 1979, Science.

[59]  P. Dirmeyer.  Using a global soil wetness dataset to improve seasonal climate simulation , 2000 .

[60]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Time Scales of Layered Soil Moisture Memory in the Context ofLand–Atmosphere Interaction , 2004 .