Comparison of Two Proximal Osteotomies for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus

Moderate to severe deformities of hallux valgus can be corrected with combination procedures, such as a proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy and a distal soft tissue procedure. Because crescentic osteotomy allows for motion in all planes, inadvertent metatarsal elevation can result in metatarsalgia. The crescentic shelf osteotomy (CSO) provides a plantar shelf, decreasing the complication of dorsiflexion fixation. Eighteen polyurethane foam specimens in three groups were prepared and tested to failure on a servohydraulic Instron testing machine. The mechanical characteristics of stiffness, deformation, ultimate failure load, and stored energy were compared between single-screw fixation crescentic osteotomies and single- and dual-screw CSOs in molded polyurethane foam metatarsal sawbones. In addition, 12 cadaver specimens were randomly divided, and a CSO or crescentic osteotomy was performed. Preosteotomy and postosteotomy intermetatarsal, dorsiflexion, and pronation angles were compared from radiograph measurements. The results showed comparable mechanical characteristics among the groups, as measured by the area under the curve (P = 0.95), ultimate failure load (P = 0.35), deformation (P = 0.63), and stiffness (P = 0.21). Greater improvements were seen in the CSO group compared with the crescentic osteotomy group in correction of the intermetatarsal angle (4.8° compared with 3.2°) and of the first metatarsal plantarflexion (2.3° compared with 3.2° of dorsiflexion). However, these differences were insignificant (P = 0.10 and P = 0.41) with the numbers available. Compared with the crescentic osteotomy, a CSO may possibly provide easier initial fixation but similar mechanical properties.

[1]  M J Coughlin,et al.  Hallux valgus. , 1997, Instructional course lectures.

[2]  M. Coughlin Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Hallux Valgus*† , 1996 .

[3]  M. Cohen,et al.  The crescentic shelf osteotomy. , 1993, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[4]  W. Brettschneider,et al.  Influence of Metatarsal Head Displacement on Metatarsal Pressure Distribution after Hallux Valgus Surgery , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[5]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Biomechanics of Bone , 1993 .

[6]  D. Thordarson,et al.  Hallux Valgus Correction with Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomy: Two-year Follow-up , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[7]  W. Wallace,et al.  The Significance of Pes Planus in Juvenile Hallux Valgus , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[8]  R. Mann,et al.  Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  F. Kummer,et al.  The Stability of Fixation of First Metatarsal Osteotomies , 1991, Foot & ankle.

[10]  J. McDermott,et al.  Crescentic Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: A Biomechanical Study of Variables Affecting the Final Position of the First Metatarsal , 1991, Foot & ankle.

[11]  F. Thompson Complications of hallux valgus surgery and salvage. , 1990, Orthopedics.

[12]  C. A. Cedell,et al.  Proximal metatarsal osteotomy in hallux valgus. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  T Kato,et al.  The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  L. SIM-FOOK,et al.  A comparison of foot forms among the non-shoe and shoe-wearing Chinese population. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  R. Haines,et al.  The anatomy of hallux valgus. , 1954, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  R. H. Hardy,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON HALLUX VALGUS , 1951 .

[17]  R. Harris,et al.  The short first metatarsal; its incidence and clinical significance. , 1949, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  G. Hohmann Der Hallux valgus und die übrigen Zehenverkrümmungen , 1925 .