Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives

Understanding how the brain constructs movements remains a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. The brain may control complex movements through flexible combination of motor primitives, where each primitive is an element of computation in the sensorimotor map that transforms desired limb trajectories into motor commands. Theoretical studies have shown that a system's ability to learn action depends on the shape of its primitives. Using a time-series analysis of error patterns, here we show that humans learn the dynamics of reaching movements through a flexible combination of primitives that have gaussian-like tuning functions encoding hand velocity. The wide tuning of the inferred primitives predicts limitations on the brain's ability to represent viscous dynamics. We find close agreement between the predicted limitations and the subjects’ adaptation to new force fields. The mathematical properties of the derived primitives resemble the tuning curves of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum. The activity of these cells may encode primitives that underlie the learning of dynamics.

[1]  R. Porter Progress in Brain Research , 1965, Nature.

[2]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[3]  R. Prokopy,et al.  MATING BEHAVIOR IN RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE): I. SITE OF ASSEMBLY , 1971 .

[4]  V. Brooks,et al.  Cortical load compensation during voluntary elbow movements. , 1974, Brain research.

[5]  F. Beaufils,et al.  FRANCE , 1979, The Lancet.

[6]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[7]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Adaptation and learning in control of voluntary movement by the central nervous system , 1988, Adv. Robotics.

[8]  G. Bush,et al.  A FIELD TEST OF DIFFERENTIAL HOST‐PLANT USAGE BETWEEN TWO SIBLING SPECIES OF RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA FRUIT FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR SYMPATRIC MODELS OF SPECIATION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Preserved Simple and Impaired Compound Movement After Infarction in the Territory of the Superior Cerebellar Artery , 1993, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Linear combinations of primitives in vertebrate motor control. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Feder,et al.  Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S P Wise,et al.  Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: their role in planning and controlling action. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. D. Fry The Evolution of Host Specialization: Are Trade-Offs Overrated? , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[17]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Timothy P. Craig,et al.  HYBRIDIZATION STUDIES ON THE HOST RACES OF EUROSTA SOLIDAGINIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SYMPATRIC SPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Models of generalization in motor control , 1998 .

[21]  Brian D. Farrell,et al.  "Inordinate Fondness" explained: why are there So many beetles? , 1998, Science.

[22]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Constructive Incremental Learning from Only Local Information , 1998, Neural Computation.

[23]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[25]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Robert M. Sanner,et al.  A mathematical model of the adaptive control of human arm motions , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  J. Feder,et al.  A FIELD TEST FOR HOST‐PLANT DEPENDENT SELECTION ON LARVAE OF THE APPLE MAGGOT FLY, RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Bastian,et al.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  T. Ebner,et al.  Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Movement Velocity in Primates during Visuomotor Arm Tracking , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  J. Feder,et al.  It's about time: the evidence for host plant‐mediated selection in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, and its implications for fitness trade‐offs in phytophagous insects , 1999 .

[33]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  S. Cooper,et al.  Differential effects of deep cerebellar nuclei inactivation on reaching and adaptive control. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[36]  J. Houk,et al.  Functional connectivity between cerebellum and primary motor cortex in the awake monkey. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[38]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Bagrat Amirikian,et al.  Directional tuning profiles of motor cortical cells , 2000, Neuroscience Research.

[40]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Cerebellar learning of accurate predictive control for fast-reaching movements , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.