Key Characteristics identification by global sensitivity analysis

During the design stage of product manufacturing, the designers try to specify only the necessary critical dimensions or what is called “Key Characteristics”. Knowing that dealing with Key Characteristics is time consuming and costly, it is preferable to reduce their number and exclude the non-contributing parameters. Different strategies that are based on qualitative or quantitative approaches for the identification of these dimensions are followed by the companies. The common way is to define the critical functional requirements which are expressed in terms of dimensions. When the functional requirements are set as critical, all the involved dimensions are labelled as Key Characteristics. However they do not have the same importance and need to be classified between contributing and non-contributing parameters. There is not a quantitative method that serves for the identification of Key Characteristics in the critical functional requirements. This paper suggests a numerical methodology which can be a step forward to a better ranking of the Key Characteristics. It is based on the global sensitivity analysis and more precisely on Sobol’ approach. The sensitivity of the Non Conformity Rate corresponding to the production of the product is measured with respect to the variable parameters characterizing the dimensions. The method is applied, first on a simple two-part example, then on a system having a linearised functional requirement and finally on a system with two non-linear functional requirements. The results show the main effects of the dimensions in addition to their interactions. Consequently it is possible to prioritize some and neglect the effect of the others and classify them respectively as Key Characteristics or not.

[1]  K. Shuler,et al.  A STUDY OF THE SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS . II , 2014 .

[2]  Sergei S. Kucherenko,et al.  Different numerical estimators for main effect global sensitivity indices , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Fred Spiring,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  E. M. Mansoor The Application of Probability to Tolerances Used in Engineering Designs , 1963 .

[5]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[6]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Francesca Pianosi,et al.  A simple and efficient method for global sensitivity analysis based on cumulative distribution functions , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Rong Li,et al.  Identification of key design characteristics for complex product adaptive design , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[9]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[10]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[11]  Andrea Bohn,et al.  EVALUATION OF SOLUTION VARIANTS IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN BY MEANS OF ADEQUATE SENSITIVITY INDICES , 2011 .

[12]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Information modeling for variation management during the product and manufacturing process design , 2008 .

[14]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical ExperienceSensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical Experience , 1995 .

[15]  B. Iooss,et al.  A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods , 2014, 1404.2405.

[16]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  A statistical method to identify main contributing tolerances in assemblability studies based on convex hull techniques , 2015 .

[17]  Denis Teissandier,et al.  Tolerance analysis of a product coupling geometric and architectural specifications in a probabilistic approach , 2013 .

[18]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife Estimate of Variance , 1981 .

[19]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  Mathematical issues in mechanical tolerance analysis , 2012 .

[20]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Moment Independent Importance Measures: New Results and Analytical Test Cases , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  ISO Deliberates Statistical Tolerancing , 1998 .

[22]  S. Khodaygan,et al.  An interactive method for computer-aided optimal process tolerance design based on automated decision making , 2018, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[23]  A. Van Hoecke Hierarchization of Characteristics Applied to the Component Approval Strategy , 2013 .

[24]  Constantin Chassapis,et al.  An interactive variation risk management environment to assess the risk of manufacturing variations , 2017 .

[25]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Anna C. Thornton,et al.  A Mathematical Framework for the Key Characteristic Process , 1999 .

[27]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[28]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 1995 .

[29]  Simon Moritz Göhler,et al.  Robustness Metrics: Consolidating the multiple approaches to quantify Robustness , 2016 .