Airspace risk management using surveillance track data: Stabilized approaches

The outcome of operations in a designated airspace is a function of the cooperation between flights in the airspace and the coordination of Air Traffic Control (ATC). A critical airspace is the approach airspace in which flights are sequenced and separated to minima to maximize utilization of the available runways. Airline procedures call for flights to meet “stable approach criteria” at 1000 ft. and 500 ft. above ground level (AGL). ATC procedures define the trajectories flown, including airspeed, to maximize throughput through the airspace and runways. The ability to achieve the stabilized approach criteria is therefore a function of the coordination of the flight crews and ATC. This paper describes a method for analysis of stabilized approaches using surveillance track data. Risk events and factors related to stabilized approach criteria are defined. A case study of 8,219 approaches is conducted at a runway of slot controlled airport with a dominant carrier. The results quantify the portion of the approaches which violate the stabilized approach criteria. Results show that 27.8% of the approaches exhibited more than 10 knots change in groundspeed after sequencing 1000 ft. AGL, 14.1% after sequencing 750 ft. AGL, and 4.4% after sequencing 500 ft. AGL. The flights with rate of descent in excess of 1000 feet per minute (fpm.) are also studied. The effects of factors such as the speed at Final Approach Fix (FAF) and the runway centerline/glidepath acquisition position are analyzed. Results show that a flight that acquires glidepath after FAF has a higher probability of having an excessive speed change from 1000 ft. AGL to the runway threshold. Aircraft weight classes are also studied. The results indicate a lower landing speed and higher deceleration rate for small aircraft. The implications of these results and the limitations of using surveillance track data for this purpose are discussed.

[1]  T. Hall,et al.  Analysis of localizer and glide slope Flight Technical Error , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[2]  Lieutenant Colonel Rudolph C. Haynie An investigation of capacity and safety in near-terminal airspace for guiding information techonogy adoption , 2002 .

[3]  John E. Robinson,et al.  RADAR-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF RUNWAY USE * , 2001 .

[4]  Dimitry M. Gorinevsky,et al.  Aircraft anomaly detection using performance models trained on fleet data , 2012, 2012 Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding.

[5]  David Nielsen,et al.  Automated discovery of flight track anomalies , 2014, 2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[6]  L. Sherry,et al.  Big data analysis of irregular operations: Aborted approaches and their underlying factors , 2013, 2013 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS).

[7]  Babak Ghalebsaz Jeddi,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Wake Vortex Hazards for Landing Aircraft Using Multilateration Data , 2007 .

[8]  Babak Ghalebsaz Jeddi,et al.  Using Multilateration Data in Probabilistic Analysis of Wake Vortex Hazards for Landing Aircraft , 2007 .

[9]  Yue Xie Quantitative analysis of airport arrival capacity and arrival safety using stochastic methods , 2005 .

[10]  John F. Shortle,et al.  Statistical Characteristics of Aircraft Arrival Tracks , 2010 .

[11]  Ghalebsaz Jeddi Babak,et al.  A Statistical Analysis of the Aircraft Landing Process , 2009 .

[12]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  An analysis of landing rates and separations at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 1996 .

[13]  J. Legge,et al.  Opportunities for improvements in simple models for estimating runway capacity , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[14]  Zhenming Wang,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Potential Wake Encounters to Stochastic Flight-Track Parameters , 2012 .

[15]  Maxime Gariel,et al.  Anomaly detection in onboard-recorded flight data using cluster analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[16]  David Schleicher,et al.  Discovery of Abnormal Flight Patterns in Flight Track Data , 2013 .

[17]  Jasenka Rakas,et al.  Statistical Modeling and Analysis of Landing Time Intervals: Case Study of Los Angeles International Airport, California , 2005 .

[18]  Akshay Belle A Methodology for Analysis of Metroplex Air Traffic Flows , 2013 .