Knowledge sharing practices of project teams when encountering changes in project scope: A contingency approach

Prior studies indicate that undesired consequences may occur if knowledge cannot be effectively shared among members of a project team. Nevertheless, there are few studies that explore the knowledge-sharing (KS) mechanisms used and the contingency factors affecting their application in the context of managing new product development projects that encounter changes in project scope. Therefore, in this research the principles of the contingency approach were adopted in order to examine the KS mechanisms used and the contingency factors affecting their use in this context via an in-depth case study. Three key KS mechanisms and three contingency factors affecting their application were identified based on the research results. The relationship between the KS mechanisms and the contingency factors is formalized in five propositions. Future research that examines the interrelationships among these contingency factors and how they collectively influence KS practices in similar contexts is encouraged.

[1]  Eric Matson,et al.  Stimulating Knowledge Sharing , 2003 .

[2]  Chinho Lin,et al.  An exploratory model of knowledge flow barriers within healthcare organizations , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Uday R. Kulkarni,et al.  A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Dustin York,et al.  Sharing the knowledge , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Constructing internal knowledge markets: considerations from mini cases , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  K. Fletcher,et al.  Communication Strategies and Marketing Performance: An Application of the Mohr and Nevin Framework to Intra-Organisational Cross-Functional Teams , 2004 .

[7]  Joseph F. Porac,et al.  Categorization bases and their influence on product category knowledge structures , 2002 .

[8]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[10]  A. Martini,et al.  Managing dispersed workers: the new challenge in Knowledge Management , 2006 .

[11]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. , 1967 .

[12]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[13]  Richard Miller,et al.  Knowledge-Salvage Practices for Dormant R&D Projects , 2011 .

[14]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Embedding Knowledge in Web Documents , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Azhar M. Khan,et al.  Patterns of empowerment and leadership style in project environment , 2010 .

[16]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[17]  A. Shtub,et al.  Managing Project Risks as Knowledge Gaps , 2006 .

[18]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Balancing Business Performance and Knowledge Performance of New Product Development , 2006 .

[19]  Sharlett Gillard,et al.  Project Management Communication: a Systems Approach , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[21]  W. Bean.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[22]  D. Burgess,et al.  What Motivates Employees to Transfer Knowledge Outside Their Work Unit? , 2005 .

[23]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[24]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[25]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects , 2006 .

[26]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  Organizational Slack and Knowledge Creation in Product Development Projects: The Role of Project Deliverables , 2010 .

[27]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model‐based project management , 2003 .

[28]  John Byrne,et al.  Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[29]  R. Burton,et al.  Leadership and Management Style , 2004 .

[30]  David N. Ford,et al.  System Dynamics Applied to Project Management: A Survey, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research , 2007, System Dynamics.

[31]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  The Effects of Information Technology Project Complexity on Group Interaction , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[33]  Robert DeFillippi,et al.  Introduction: Project-Based Learning, Reflective Practices and Learning , 2001 .

[34]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Towards a contingency approach to performance measurement: an empirical study in Scottish SMEs , 2007 .

[35]  M. Baba,et al.  The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team , 2004 .

[36]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Understanding and managing iterative error and change cycles in construction , 2007 .

[37]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Contingency Theory: Some Suggested Directions , 1984 .

[38]  Maria Adenfelt.  Exploring the performance of transnational projects : Shared knowledge, coordination and communication , 2010 .

[39]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[40]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com , 2001 .

[41]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[42]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The Project Manager's Leadership Style as a Success Factor on Projects: A Literature Review , 2005 .

[43]  M. Vartiainen,et al.  Characteristics of knowledge sharing communities in project organizations , 2005 .

[44]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Knowledge strategy planning: methodology and case , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[47]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Beyond the Balanced Scorecard:: Refining the Search for Organizational Success Measures , 2003 .

[48]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Knowledge reuse in action: the case of CALL , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[49]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Knowledge Sharing: Context, Controversy and Confusion , 2003 .

[50]  Brian Canavan,et al.  Technical education in Scotland: Fit for purpose? , 2007 .

[51]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[52]  Fan-Chuan Tseng,et al.  Interplay between Physical and Virtual Settings for Online Interpersonal Trust Formation in Knowledge-Sharing Practice , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[53]  W. Trochim.  Outcome pattern matching and program theory , 1989 .

[54]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[55]  Dan Holtshouse.  Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[56]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[57]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[59]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[60]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[61]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[62]  Sharlett Gillard,et al.  Information resources project management communication: personal and environmental barriers , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[63]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Leadership for sustainable innovation , 2007 .

[64]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[65]  Lisa Abrams,et al.  Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2001 .

[67]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[68]  Soonhee Kim,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities , 2006 .

[69]  Esbjörn Segelod,et al.  Software Innovativeness: Outcomes on Project Performance, Knowledge Enhancement, and External Linkages , 2006 .

[70]  Wei-Tsong Wang,et al.  The role of knowledge management in achieving effective crisis management: a case study , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[71]  S. Sieber.  The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  Wei-Li Wu,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge transfer: a team-level analysis , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[73]  J. Bonache,et al.  The Impact of Team Atmosphere on Knowledge Outcomes in Self-managed Teams , 2005 .

[74]  S. Haslam,et al.  The ASPIRe model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to enhance organizational outcomes. , 2003 .

[75]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  The Contingency Approach: Its Foundations and Relevance to Theory Building and Research in Marketing , 1988 .

[76]  Taehun Kim,et al.  The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[77]  Victoria L. Mitchell.  Knowledge Integration and Infromation Technology Project Performance , 2006, MIS Q..

[78]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[79]  A. Ledwith,et al.  Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm , 2010 .

[80]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  Cocreating Understanding and Value in Distributed Work: How Members of Onsite and Offshore Vendor Teams Give, Make, Demand, and Break Sense , 2008, MIS Q..

[81]  Kaj U. Koskinen.  Tacit knowledge as a promoter of project success , 2000 .

[82]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Postimplementation Knowledge Transfers to Users and Information Technology Professionals , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Bruce T. Barkley.  Project Management in New Product Development , 2007 .

[84]  Lewlyn L R Rodrigues,et al.  System dynamics approach for change management in new product development , 2006 .

[85]  Guo Jian,et al.  A multi-agent based knowledge search framework to support the product development process , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[86]  Peter Bernus,et al.  Business process modeling through the knowledge management perspective , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[87]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..