Methods to calibrate and scale axial distances in confocal microscopy as a function of refractive index

Accurate distance measurement in 3D confocal microscopy is important for quantitative analysis, volume visualization and image restoration. However, axial distances can be distorted by both the point spread function (PSF) and by a refractive‐index mismatch between the sample and immersion liquid, which are difficult to separate. Additionally, accurate calibration of the axial distances in confocal microscopy remains cumbersome, although several high‐end methods exist. In this paper we present two methods to calibrate axial distances in 3D confocal microscopy that are both accurate and easily implemented. With these methods, we measured axial scaling factors as a function of refractive‐index mismatch for high‐aperture confocal microscopy imaging. We found that our scaling factors are almost completely linearly dependent on refractive index and that they were in good agreement with theoretical predictions that take the full vectorial properties of light into account. There was however a strong deviation with the theoretical predictions using (high‐angle) geometrical optics, which predict much lower scaling factors. As an illustration, we measured the PSF of a correctly calibrated point‐scanning confocal microscope and showed that a nearly index‐matched, micron‐sized spherical object is still significantly elongated due to this PSF, which signifies that care has to be taken when determining axial calibration or axial scaling using such particles.

[1]  Zach DeVito,et al.  Opt , 2017 .

[2]  K. Neuman,et al.  Measurement of the effective focal shift in an optical trap. , 2005, Optics letters.

[3]  S. Egelhaaf,et al.  Confocal microscopy of colloidal particles: towards reliable, optimum coordinates. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[4]  Ws. Rasband ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA , 2011 .

[5]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[6]  H. Lekkerkerker,et al.  Preparation of monodisperse, fluorescent PMMA-latex colloids by dispersion polymerization. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  M Gu,et al.  University of Birmingham Influence of spherical aberration on axial imaging of confocal reflection microscopy , 2006 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Eric R. Weeks,et al.  Confocal microscopy of colloids , 2007 .

[10]  D A Weitz,et al.  Note: A three-dimensional calibration device for the confocal microscope. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .

[12]  Claire M. Brown,et al.  Measuring and interpreting point spread functions to determine confocal microscope resolution and ensure quality control , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[13]  Rachel J Errington,et al.  Fluorescence techniques for drug delivery research: theory and practice. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  R. Schropp,et al.  Characterization of Photonic Colloidal Single Crystals by Microradian X‐ray Diffraction , 2006 .

[15]  Joshua W Shaevitz,et al.  Enhanced three-dimensional deconvolution microscopy using a measured depth-varying point-spread function. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  F. R. Boddeke,et al.  Calibration of the automated z‐axis of a microscope using focus functions , 1997 .

[17]  A. Diaspro,et al.  Influence of refractive-index mismatch in high-resolution three-dimensional confocal microscopy. , 2002, Applied optics.

[18]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Refractive index and axial distance measurements in 3-D microscopy , 1992 .

[19]  Taco D. Visser,et al.  Comparison of different theories for focusing through a plane interface , 1997 .

[20]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal and multi-photon fluorescence microscopy induced by refractive index mismatch , 2006 .

[21]  I. Nikolov,et al.  Analysis of the dispersion of optical plastic materials , 2007 .

[22]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[23]  H T van der Voort,et al.  Imaging properties in two-photon excitation microscopy and effects of refractive-index mismatch in thick specimens. , 1999, Applied optics.

[24]  T. Visser,et al.  Volume measurements in three-dimensional microscopy , 2008 .

[25]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Effect of the specimen refractive index on the imaging of a confocal fluorescence microscope employing high aperture oil immersion lenses , 1995 .

[26]  Jane F. Bertone,et al.  Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness , 1999 .

[27]  H. M. Voort,et al.  Restoration of confocal images for quantitative image analysis , 1995 .

[28]  Cremer,et al.  High‐precision distance measurements and volume‐conserving segmentation of objects near and below the resolution limit in three‐dimensional confocal fluorescence microscopy , 1998 .

[29]  Stephen W. Paddock,et al.  Confocal Microscopy , 2019, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[30]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of specimen refractive index on confocal imaging , 1997 .

[31]  186 , 2022 .

[32]  Mark D. Fricker,et al.  Aberration control in quantitative imaging of botanical specimens by multidimensional fluorescence microscopy , 1996 .