Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE To test the hypotheses that wheelchair skills training of community-based manual wheelchair users is efficacious, safe, and practical. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Rehabilitation center and community. PARTICIPANTS Twenty community-based manual wheelchair users (15 men, 5 women; age range, 21-77 y), half with musculoskeletal and half with neurologic disorders. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly allocated to the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) or control groups. In 1-hour individualized sessions, the WSTP group participants received a mean +/- standard deviation of 4.5+/-0.7 hours of training. Caregivers participated whenever possible. In addition to training at the rehabilitation center, the trainer traveled to administer training in the community. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Using the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST, version 3.1), an objective test of 57 skills, we calculated total and subtotal percentage scores (percentage number of skills passed of those possible) and individual skill success rates. RESULTS The WSTP group's improvement in total WST score was significantly greater than the control group's (P<.005). The mean total WST score for the WSTP group increased from a pretraining value of 63.3%+/-6.0% to 78.5%+/-8.3% posttraining, a relative improvement of 24.0% (P=.002). The control group increased from a baseline value of 70.8%+/-14.0% to 74.2%+/-11.8% at follow-up, a relative improvement of 4.8% (P=.03). The WSTP group had clinically significant pre- and posttraining improvements (> or = 20%) in the success rates of 25 of the 57 individual WST skills, compared with only 5 skills for the control group. There were no adverse incidents, and the WSTP participants' comments were all positive. CONCLUSIONS Wheelchair skills training of community-based manual wheelchair users is efficacious, safe, and practical. These findings have implications for the standard of rehabilitation care.

[1]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[4]  R L Kirby,et al.  Spotter strap for the prevention of wheelchair tipping. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Rogerio Pereira Lima,et al.  Rehearsal of Task Variations and Contextual Interference Effect in a Field Setting , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Krista L Best,et al.  The manual wheelchair-handling skills of caregivers and the effect of training. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Jutai,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.  The CONSORT Statement , 1996 .

[10]  M. Kolber,et al.  Shoulder pain in wheelchair users with tetraplegia and paraplegia. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Charles H. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference: Contributions of practice , 1990 .

[12]  S Bullard,et al.  Comparison of Teaching Methods to Learn a Tilt and Balance Wheelchair Skill , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  R L Kirby,et al.  NONFATAL WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRONIC INJURY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  R Weiss-Lambrou,et al.  Item Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) , 2000, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[16]  R A Cooper,et al.  Shoulder imaging abnormalities in individuals with paraplegia. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Activity Restriction Among Wheelchair Users , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  R L Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY TIPS AND FALLS AMONG NONINSTITUTIONALIZED USERS OF MANUALLY PROPELLED WHEELCHAIRS IN NOVA SCOTIA , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  R P Gaal,et al.  Wheelchair rider injuries: causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Learning to perform wheelchair wheelies: comparison of 2 training strategies. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[22]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Evaluation of manual wheelchair skills: is objective testing necessary or would subjective estimates suffice? , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[25]  Krista L Best,et al.  The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.