Design of water supply system from rivers using artificial intelligence to model water hammer

Abstract Water hammer phenomena is one of the most destructive parameters for designing the water supply systems. This study aims to design sewage transfer system resistant to water hammers through the application of artificial intelligence. The intake location was selected with respect to sediment condition and permissible maximum discharge. After that the water pumping system had been designed and the water hammer phenomenon (WHP) was estimated using the Hytran model. Results showed that the combination of rough UPVC pipes and water hammering controlling facilitation can be chosen as the most proper system for designing the desired system. Also, the Hytran model results showed that the maximum pressure was occurred in 96.59 meters distance. On the other hand, using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and a hybrid model, ANFIS optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO), WHP was estimated in the pipes. The results showed that the ANFIS had better performance in estimation of WHP in the UPVC pipes while the ANFIS-PSO was found to be more suitable in metal pipes.

[1]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Estimation of Daily Suspended Sediment Load by Using Wavelet Conjunction Models , 2012 .

[2]  Jaber Soltani,et al.  Fuzzified Pipes Dataset to Predict Failure Rates by Hybrid SVR-PSO Algorithm , 2016 .

[3]  Armin Azad,et al.  Prediction of Water Quality Parameters Using ANFIS Optimized by Intelligence Algorithms (Case Study: Gorganrood River) , 2017, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.

[4]  Shokoufeh Pourshahabi,et al.  Fuzzy genetic algorithm approach for optimization of surge tanks , 2013 .

[5]  Nicola Fontana,et al.  Losses Reduction and Energy Production in Water-Distribution Networks , 2012 .

[6]  Jalal Shiri,et al.  Modeling river total bed material load discharge using artificial intelligence approaches (based on conceptual inputs) , 2014 .

[7]  T. Sturm,et al.  Open Channel Hydraulics , 2001 .

[8]  Agnieszka Malesińska.  Experimental study of water hammer-induced forces and deformations in dry pipe fire protection systems , 2015 .

[9]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  Water drop impacts on a single-layer of mesh screen membrane: Effect of water hammer pressure and advancing contact angles , 2017 .

[10]  Jalal Shiri,et al.  Groundwater quality modeling using neuro-particle swarm optimization and neuro-differential evolution techniques , 2017 .

[11]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Modeling of Dissolved Oxygen in River Water Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques , 2013 .

[12]  Amir Jalalkamali,et al.  Using of hybrid fuzzy models to predict spatiotemporal groundwater quality parameters , 2015, Earth Science Informatics.

[13]  Jalal Shiri,et al.  Modeling energy dissipation over stepped spillways using machine learning approaches , 2014 .

[14]  Chao Xu,et al.  Optimal boundary control for water hammer suppression in fluid transmission pipelines , 2014, Comput. Math. Appl..

[15]  Jalal Shiri,et al.  Artificial neural networks vs. Gene Expression Programming for estimating outlet dissolved oxygen in micro-irrigation sand filters fed with effluents , 2013 .

[16]  A. J. Schleiss,et al.  Physical Tests for Estimating the Water-Hammer Wave Speed in Pipes and Tunnels with Local Weak Wall Stiffness , 2011 .

[17]  J. Shiri,et al.  Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating friction factor in alluvial channels , 2014 .

[18]  Anton Bergant,et al.  Water hammer with column separation : a review of research in the twentieth century , 2004 .

[19]  Stefan Becker,et al.  Measurements of junction coupling during water hammer in piping systems , 2014 .

[20]  Mohammad Najafzadeh,et al.  Prediction of the friction factor in pipes using model tree , 2018 .

[21]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Extreme water-hammer pressure during one-after-another load shedding in pumped-storage stations , 2016 .

[22]  Jalal Shiri,et al.  Neural networks- and neuro-fuzzy-based determination of influential parameters on energy dissipation over stepped spillways under nappe flow regime , 2017 .