Life cycle assessment of high-rate anaerobic treatment, microbial fuel cells, and microbial electrolysis cells.

Existing wastewater treatment options are generally perceived as energy intensive and environmentally unfriendly. Much attention has been focused on two new approaches in the past years, (i) microbial fuel cells and (ii) microbial electrolysis cells, which directly generate electrical current or chemical products, respectively, during wastewater treatment. These systems are commonly denominated as bioelectrochemical systems, and a multitude of claims have been made in the past regarding the environmental impact of these treatment options. However, an in-depth study backing these claims has not been performed. Here, we have conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental impact of three industrial wastewater treatment options, (i) anaerobic treatment with biogas generation, (ii) a microbial fuel cell treatment, with direct electricity generation, and (iii) a microbial electrolysis cell, with hydrogen peroxide production. Our analysis showed that a microbial fuel cell does not provide a significant environmental benefit relative to the "conventional" anaerobic treatment option. However, a microbial electrolysis cell provides significant environmental benefits through the displacement of chemical production by conventional means. Provided that the target conversion level of 1000 A.m(-3) can be met, the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and other environmentally harmful emissions (e.g., aromatic hydrocarbons) of the microbial electrolysis cell will be a key driver for the development of an industrial standard for this technology. Evidently, this assessment is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions, such as the used reactor materials and target performance. This provides a challenge and an opportunity for researchers in the field to select and develop appropriate and environmentally benign materials of construction, as well as demonstrate the required 1000 A.m(-3) performance at pilot and full scale.

[1]  J. Zeikus,et al.  Utilization of Electrically Reduced Neutral Red byActinobacillus succinogenes: Physiological Function of Neutral Red in Membrane-Driven Fumarate Reduction and Energy Conservation , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment of a Sewage‐Treatment Plant in South‐East Asia , 2000 .

[3]  P. Foller,et al.  Processes for the production of mixtures of caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide via the reduction of oxygen , 1995 .

[4]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Electricity generation from model organic wastewater in a cassette-electrode microbial fuel cell , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[5]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[6]  P. Lant,et al.  Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. , 2010, Water research.

[7]  Jurg Keller,et al.  Efficient hydrogen peroxide generation from organic matter in a bioelectrochemical system , 2009 .

[8]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  Hong Liu,et al.  Enhanced Coulombic efficiency and power density of air-cathode microbial fuel cells with an improved cell configuration , 2007 .

[10]  H. Hamelers,et al.  Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis , 2006 .

[11]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Bernhard Schink,et al.  Enhanced Propionate Formation by Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. freudenreichii in a Three-Electrode Amperometric Culture System , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  John N. Lester,et al.  The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes , 1995 .

[14]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Tubular microbial fuel cells for efficient electricity generation. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  J N Lester,et al.  Evaluation of Environmental Burdens Associated with Sewage Treatment Processes Using Life Cycle Assessment Techniques , 2005, Environmental technology.

[16]  Albert Germain,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water: From the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant (9 pp) , 2007 .

[17]  H. Rismani-Yazdi,et al.  Cathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview , 2008 .

[18]  Hong Liu,et al.  Electrochemically assisted microbial production of hydrogen from acetate. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[21]  C. W. Jones,et al.  Applications of Hydrogen Peroxide and Derivatives , 1999 .

[22]  Qingliang Zhao,et al.  Increased sustainable electricity generation in up-flow air-cathode microbial fuel cells. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[23]  Derek R Lovley,et al.  Remediation and recovery of uranium from contaminated subsurface environments with electrodes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  S. Hs,et al.  Electrically enhanced ethanol fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002 .

[25]  Takeshi Onizawa,et al.  Direct and continuous production of hydrogen peroxide with 93 % selectivity using a fuel-cell system. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  W Verstraete,et al.  Combining biocatalyzed electrolysis with anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[27]  C. Buisman,et al.  Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[28]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental Evaluation of Different Treatment Processes for Sludge from Urban Wastewater Treatments: Anaerobic Digestion versus Thermal Processes (10 pp) , 2005 .

[29]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Trichloroethene dechlorination and H2 evolution are alternative biological pathways of electric charge utilization by a dechlorinating culture in a bioelectrochemical system. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.