Mechanical Performance of Cylindrical and Dual-Core Pedicle Screws After Repeated Insertion

Study Design. Ex vivo study of the mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual-core pedicle screws after insertion, removal, and reinsertion in the same hole. Objective. To evaluate the effect of repeated use of same screw hole on the insertion torque and the retentive strength of the cylindrical and dual-core screws. Summary of Background Data. Insertion and removal of pedicle screws is sometimes necessary during surgical procedure to assess the integrity of the pilot-hole wall. However, this maneuver may compromise the implant-holding capacity. Methods. Sixty thoracolombar vertebrae (T13–L5), harvested from 10 healthy calves, were used to insert 2 different designs of pedicle screws: cylindrical (5.0-mm outer diameter) and dual-core screws (5.2-mm outer diameter). Three experimental groups were created on the basis of the number of insertions of the screws and 2 subgroups were established according to the core pedicle screw design (dual-core and cylindrical). The insertion torque was measured during initial insertion, second insertion, and third insertion. Pullout screw tests were performed using a universal testing machine to evaluate the pullout strength after initial insertion, second insertion, and third insertion. Results. Significant reductions of 38% in mean insertion torque and 30% in mean pullout strength of dual-core screw were observed between the initial insertion and the third insertion. The cylindrical screw observed significant reductions of 52.5% in mean insertion torque and 42.3% in mean pullout strength between the initial insertion and the third insertion. A reduction of mean insertion torque and pullout strength between the first insertion and the second insertion but without significance was also observed for both types of screws. Conclusion. Insertions and reinsertion of either cylindrical or dual-core pedicle screws have compromised insertion torque and pullout strength of the implants as measured by mechanical tests.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III) , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[2]  T. Lu,et al.  Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[3]  F. D. de Paula,et al.  The Effect of Repetitive Pilot-Hole Use on the Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength of Vertebral System Screws , 2009, Spine.

[4]  Bertil Bouillon,et al.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Serkan Inceoğlu,et al.  Cortex of the pedicle of the vertebral arch. Part II: Microstructure. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  R. McLain,et al.  Cortex of the pedicle of the vertebral arch. Part I: Deformation characteristics during screw insertion. , 2007, Journal of Neurosurgery : Spine.

[7]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pedicle screw fixation (T1, T2, and T3). , 2007, Instructional course lectures.

[8]  Qing Hang Zhang,et al.  Effects of bone materials on the screw pull-out strength in human spine. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  J. Goldhahn,et al.  Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae , 2006, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[10]  R. Molinari,et al.  Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[11]  L. Lenke,et al.  Thoracic pedicle screw placement: free-hand technique. , 2005, Neurology India.

[12]  C. Chao,et al.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  Zi-xiang Wu,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[14]  R. McLain,et al.  Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[16]  R. Lehman,et al.  Effect of Various Tapping Diameters on Insertion of Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[17]  A. Dhawan,et al.  In Vivo Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws , 2001, Spine.

[18]  E. Schneider,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro holding strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in a fully inserted setting and backed out 180 degrees. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  V K Goel,et al.  Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model. , 1999, Spine.

[20]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: Laboratory test and clinical study , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[21]  T C Hearn,et al.  Insertional Torque and Pull‐out Strengths of Conical and Cylindrical Pedicle Screws in Cadaveric Bone , 1996, Spine.

[22]  V K Goel,et al.  Effect of Specimen Fixation Method on Pullout Tests of Pedicle Screws , 1996, Spine.

[23]  J. K. Mayfield,et al.  The Effects of Pedicle Screw Fit: An In Vitro Study , 1994, Spine.

[24]  W C Hutton,et al.  Correlations between screw hole preparation, torque of insertion, and pullout strength for spinal screws. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[25]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[26]  K. Gill,et al.  Complications of the Wiltse Pedicle Screw Fixation System. , 1993, Spine.

[27]  D L Myers,et al.  Complications of Lumbar Spinal Fusion with Transpedicular Instrumentation , 1992, Spine.

[28]  D. Bradford,et al.  Complications of the Variable Screw Plate Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1991, Spine.

[29]  D. E. Swartz,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of calf lumbosacral trabecular bone. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  H. Matsuzaki,et al.  Problems and Solutions of Pedicle Screw Plate Fixation of Lumbar Spine , 1990, Spine.