Comparison of nonenhanced MR angiographic subtraction techniques for infragenual arteries at 1.5 T: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE To evaluate diagnostic performance of three nonenhanced methods: variable-refocusing-flip angle (FA) fast spin-echo (SE)-based magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (variable FA MR) and constant-refocusing-FA fast SE-based MR angiography (constant-FA MR) and flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared steady-state free precession MR angiography (FSD MR) for calf arteries, with dual-injection three-station contrast material-enhanced MR angiography (gadolinium-enhanced MR) as reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, with informed consent. Twenty-one patients (13 men, eight women; mean age, 62.6 years) underwent calf-station variable-FA MR, constant-FA MR, and FSD MR at 1.5 T, with gadolinium-enhanced MR as reference. Image quality and stenosis severity were assessed in 13 segments per leg by two radiologists blinded to clinical data. Combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR reading was also performed. Methods were compared (logistic regression for correlated data) for diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS Of 546 arterial segments, 148 (27.1%) had a hemodynamically significant (≥ 50%) stenosis. Image quality was satisfactory for all nonenhanced MR sequences. FSD MR was significantly superior to both other sequences (P < .0001), with 5-cm smaller field of view; 9.6% variable-FA MR, 9.6% constant-FA MR, and 0% FSD MR segmental evaluations had nondiagnostic image quality scores, mainly from high diastolic flow (variable-FA MR) and motion artifact (constant-FA MR). Stenosis sensitivity and specificity were highest for FSD MR (80.3% and 81.7%, respectively), compared with those for constant-FA MR (72.3%, P = .086; and 81.8%, P = .96) and variable-FA MR (75.9%, P = .54; and 75.6%, P = .22). Combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR had superior sensitivity (81.8%) and specificity (88.3%) compared with constant-FA MR (P = .0076), variable-FA MR (P = .0044), and FSD MR (P = .0013). All sequences had an excellent negative predictive value (NPV): 93.2%, constant-FA MR; 94.7%, variable-FA MR; 91.7%, FSD MR; and 92.9%, combined constant-FA MR and FSD MR. CONCLUSION At 1.5 T, all evaluated nonenhanced MR angiographic methods demonstrated satisfactory image quality and excellent NPV for hemodynamically significant stenosis. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120859/-/DC1.

[1]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Pippa Storey,et al.  Tailoring the flow sensitivity of fast spin‐echo sequences for noncontrast peripheral MR angiography , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  M. Koelemay,et al.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, JAMA.

[4]  Jian Xu,et al.  3D nongadolinium‐enhanced ECG‐gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: Preliminary clinical experience , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  V. Lee,et al.  Arterial flow characteristics in the presence of vascular disease and implications for fast spin echo‐based noncontrast MR angiography , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  D. Nanz,et al.  Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Flow compensation in balanced SSFP sequences , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Multicenter randomized controlled trial of the costs and effects of noninvasive diagnostic imaging in patients with peripheral arterial disease: the DIPAD trial. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  F. Admiraal-Behloul,et al.  Noncontrast‐enhanced peripheral MRA: Technical optimization of flow‐spoiled fresh blood imaging for screening peripheral arterial diseases , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: Effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors , 2006 .

[13]  V. Mohan,et al.  Comparison of colour duplex ultrasound and ankle-brachial pressure index measurements in peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients with foot infections. , 2002, The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India.

[14]  T. Grobner.  Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[15]  A. Laine,et al.  EFFECT OF FLIP ANGLE EVOLUTION ON FLOW SENSITIVITIES IN ECG-GATED FAST SPIN ECHO MRA METHODS AT 3 , 2008 .

[16]  Gerhard Laub,et al.  Time‐resolved lower extremity MRA with temporal interpolation and stochastic spiral trajectories: Preliminary clinical experience , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  M J Koelemay,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[18]  J. Carr,et al.  3D noncontrast MR angiography of the distal lower extremities using flow‐sensitive dephasing (FSD)‐prepared balanced SSFP , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. Viergever,et al.  MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. , 2001, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[20]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Acute and Chronic Inflammation , 2010 .

[21]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Non‐contrast‐enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG‐synchronized half‐Fourier fast spin echo , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  R. Edelman,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease in a symptomatic diabetic population: prospective comparison of rapid unenhanced MR angiography (MRA) with contrast-enhanced MRA. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  F. S. Pereles,et al.  Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  A. Djamali,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. , 2007, Radiology.

[25]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[26]  F. Logerfo,et al.  A decade of experience with dorsalis pedis artery bypass: analysis of outcome in more than 1000 cases. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Combining segmental systolic pressures and plethysmography to diagnose arterial occlusive disease of the legs. , 1979, American journal of surgery.

[28]  M. Chren,et al.  Impact of renal insufficiency on mortality in advanced lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[29]  R. Edelman,et al.  Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[30]  C. Andersen,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of lower extremity hemodynamics in individuals with diabetes mellitus. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[31]  D. Gilroy.  ACUTE AND CHRONIC INFLAMMATION , 2010 .

[32]  R. Meuli,et al.  Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. , 1985, Science.

[33]  D. Bilecen,et al.  Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA on a short, wide-bore 1.5-T system: intra-individual comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA , 2008, European Radiology.

[34]  R. Edelman,et al.  Quiescent‐interval single‐shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: Technical considerations and clinical feasibility , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  J. Carr,et al.  Determination of the optimal first‐order gradient moment for flow‐sensitive dephasing magnetization‐prepared 3D noncontrast MR angiography , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.