Modeling Small Systems Through the Relative Entropy Lattice

There are certain contexts, where we would like to analyze the behavior of small interacting systems, such as sports teams. While large interacting systems have drawn much attention in the past years, let it be physical systems of interacting particles or social networks, small systems are short of appropriate quantitative modeling and measurement tools. We propose a simple procedure for analyzing a small system through the degree in which its behavior at different granularity levels (e.g., dyads) non-linearly diverges from the simple additive behavior of its sub-units. For example, we may model the behavior of a soccer team by measuring the extent to which the behavior changes when we move from individual players to dyads, triads, and so on. In this paper, we address the challenge of modeling small systems in terms of measuring divergence from additivity at different granularity levels of the system. We present and develop a measure for quantifying divergence from additivity through what we term a Relative Entropy Lattice, and illustrate its benefits in modeling the behavior of a specific small system, a soccer team, using data from the English Premier League. Our method has practical implications too, such as allowing the coach to identify “hidden” weak spots in the team’s behavior.

[1]  Constantino Tsallis,et al.  Nonadditive entropy: The concept and its use , 2008, 0812.4370.

[2]  Amin Coja-Oghlan,et al.  Chasing the k-colorability threshold , 2013 .

[3]  Yair Neuman,et al.  A Novel Procedure for Measuring Semantic Synergy , 2017, Complex..

[4]  Dan Vilenchik,et al.  Simple Statistics Are Sometime Too Simple: A Case Study in Social Media Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[5]  C. Emmeche,et al.  EXPLAINING EMERGENCE: TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LEVELS , 1997 .

[6]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  Yair Neuman,et al.  A proposed methodology for studying the historical trajectory of words' meaning through Tsallis entropy , 2018 .

[8]  Denis Noble,et al.  Is the whole different from the sum of its parts? A proposed procedure for measuring divergence from additivity , 2018, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[9]  Dan Vilenchik The Million Tweets Fallacy: Activity and Feedback Are Uncorrelated , 2018, ICWSM.

[10]  David Corfield,et al.  Review of F. William Lawvere and Stephen Schanuel, 'Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories' , 2002 .

[11]  Claudia Canali,et al.  A quantitative methodology based on component analysis to identify key users in social networks , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Netw. Min..

[12]  R. Martinez Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation , 1990 .

[13]  J. Davies The individual success of musicians, like that of physicists, follows a stretched exponential distribution , 2002 .

[14]  Dan Vilenchik,et al.  The Adaptive Behavior of a Soccer Team: An Entropy-Based Analysis , 2018, Entropy.

[15]  R. Goldblatt Topoi, the Categorial Analysis of Logic , 1979 .

[16]  Sol Efroni,et al.  The Immune System Computes the State of the Body: Crowd Wisdom, Machine Learning, and Immune Cell Reference Repertoires Help Manage Inflammation , 2019, Front. Immunol..

[17]  H. Haken Some Aspects of Synergetics , 1977 .

[18]  E. Friedgut,et al.  Sharp thresholds of graph properties, and the -sat problem , 1999 .

[19]  Raj Kumar Pan,et al.  The statistical laws of popularity: universal properties of the box-office dynamics of motion pictures , 2010, 1010.2634.