Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology

The relationship of scientific knowledge development to technological development is widely recognized as one of the most important and complex aspects of technological evolution. This paper adds to our understanding of the relationship through use of a more rigorous structure for differentiating among technologies based upon technological domains (defined as consisting of the artifacts over time that fulfill a specific generic function using a specific body of technical knowledge). The key findings of the work are: Firstly, a Pearson correlation of 0.564 is found between technological relatedness among technological domains based upon patents citing other patents and technological relatedness among technological domains based upon patents citing similar scientific papers. This result indicates that a large portion of technological relatedness is due to relatedness of the underlying scientific categories. Secondly, the overall structure of the links found between scientific categories and technological domains is many-to-many rather than focused indicating a science-fostered mechanism for fairly broad “spillover”: Specific technological domains cite a wide variety of scientific categories; some scientific categories are cited in a variety of domains. Thirdly, some evidence is found supporting the co-evolution of science and technology but the evidence is not strong. Prior research that identifies emerging patent clusters and independent prior research identifying emerging scientific topics show statistically significant but qualitatively weak inter-relationships between the clusters and topics. This work also offers evidence that patent cluster emergence can, but does not usually, precede the emergence of related scientific topics. The lack of clear evidence for co-evolution is interpreted as resulting from the documented complex many-to-many relationship of science categories and technological domains and is not considered evidence against co-evolution.

[1]  R. Tijssen.  Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[2]  Vincent Cros,et al.  The 2007 Nobel Prize in Physics: Albert Fert and Peter Grünberg , 2009 .

[3]  Baris Gencer,et al.  Electrocardiographic Screening for Prolonged QT Interval to Reduce Sudden Cardiac Death in Psychiatric Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Towards quantification of the role of materials innovation in overall technological development , 2012, Complex..

[6]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field , 2013, Scientometrics.

[7]  Chris Arney.  Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread - the Lessons from a New Science , 2014 .

[8]  A. Rip.  Science and technology as dancing partners , 1992 .

[9]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inside the black box: The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[10]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Using Enhanced Patent Data for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Dependence of technological improvement on artifact interactions , 2016 .

[12]  Sergio Petralia,et al.  Sources and contexts of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities , 2020 .

[13]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[14]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Toward a consensus map of science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors , 2003 .

[16]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth , 2015 .

[17]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[18]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[19]  Robert Friedel,et al.  Pursuing Power and Light: Technology and Physics from James Watt to Albert Einstein , 2010 .

[20]  Xin Guo,et al.  Decomposition and Analysis of Technological domains for better understanding of Technological Structure , 2016, ArXiv.

[21]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[22]  David F. Channell.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[23]  Maree Barnes,et al.  Light sensors for objective light measurement in ambulatory polysomnography , 2017, PloS one.

[24]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Technology structural implications from the extension of a patent search method , 2014, Scientometrics.

[25]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[26]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[27]  Manuel Acosta,et al.  Science–technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents , 2003 .

[28]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  Linkage Between Basic Research Literature and Patents , 1980 .

[29]  K. Pearson.  VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[30]  Subarna Basnet,et al.  Artifact interactions retard technological improvement: An empirical study , 2017, PloS one.

[31]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection , 2013, The European Physical Journal B.

[32]  Anthony F. J. van Raan.  Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[33]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[34]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assigning Patents to Industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance , 1997 .

[35]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[37]  H. Small,et al.  Identifying emerging topics in science and technology , 2014 .

[38]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[39]  D. Price.  Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography , 1965 .

[40]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[41]  Travis J. Lybbert,et al.  Getting Patents and Economic Data to Speak to Each Other: An 'Algorithmic Links with Probabilities' Approach for Joint Analyses of Patenting and Economic Activity , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis , 2016 .

[43]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[44]  H. Grupp.  Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach , 1996 .

[45]  Russel E. Kaufman,et al.  “Science, the Endless Frontier” , 1960, Nature.

[46]  Anthony Breitzman,et al.  The Emerging Clusters Model: A tool for identifying emerging technologies across multiple patent systems , 2015 .

[47]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy , 2016 .

[49]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[51]  D. Edgerton.  ‘The linear model’ did not exist: Reflections on the history and historiography of science and research in industry in the twentieth century , 2004 .

[52]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The structure of invention , 2007 .

[53]  Rainer Frietsch,et al.  Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research , 2003 .

[54]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance , 2016 .

[55]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Indicators and the relations between science and technology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[56]  L. Orsenigo,et al.  In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay , 2010 .