Augmented reality and artificial intelligence-based navigation during percutaneous vertebroplasty: a pilot randomised clinical trial

Purpose To assess technical feasibility, accuracy, safety and patient radiation exposure of a novel navigational tool integrating augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI), during percutaneous vertebroplasty of patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Material and methods This prospective parallel randomised open trial compared the trans-pedicular access phase of percutaneous vertebroplasty across two groups of 10 patients, electronically randomised, with symptomatic single-level VCFs. Trocar insertion was performed using AR/AI-guidance with motion compensation in Group A, and standard fluoroscopy in Group B. The primary endpoint was technical feasibility in Group A. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of Groups A and B in terms of accuracy of trocar placement (distance between planned/actual trajectory on sagittal/coronal fluoroscopic images); complications; time for trocar deployment; and radiation dose/fluoroscopy time. Results Technical feasibility in Group A was 100%. Accuracy in Group A was 1.68 ± 0.25 mm (skin entry point), and 1.02 ± 0.26 mm (trocar tip) in the sagittal plane, and 1.88 ± 0.28 mm (skin entry point) and 0.86 ± 0.17 mm (trocar tip) in the coronal plane, without any significant difference compared to Group B ( p  > 0.05). No complications were observed in the entire population. Time for trocar deployment was significantly longer in Group A (642 ± 210 s) than in Group B (336 ± 60 s; p  = 0.001). Dose–area product and fluoroscopy time were significantly lower in Group A (182.6 ± 106.7 mGy cm 2 and 5.2 ± 2.6 s) than in Group B (367.8 ± 184.7 mGy cm 2 and 10.4 ± 4.1 s; p  = 0.025 and 0.005), respectively. Conclusion AR/AI-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty appears feasible, accurate and safe, and facilitates lower patient radiation exposure compared to standard fluoroscopic guidance. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

[1]  R. Nachabe,et al.  Surgical Navigation Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Integrated 3D Intraoperative Imaging , 2016, Spine.

[2]  R. Fessler,et al.  The Technological Development of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery , 2014, BioMed research international.

[3]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Augmented reality visualization with image overlay for MRI-guided intervention: accuracy for lumbar spinal procedures with a 1.5-T MRI system. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging-guided interventions: assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T. , 2012, Radiology.

[5]  Kai-Che Liu,et al.  Real-time advanced spinal surgery via visible patient model and augmented reality system , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  A. Gangi,et al.  CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation , 2017, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[7]  Robert Homan,et al.  Augmented Reality on a C-Arm System: A Preclinical Assessment for Percutaneous Needle Localization. , 2016, Radiology.

[8]  Joseph A. Sclafani,et al.  Complications Associated With the Initial Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  A. Gangi,et al.  Imaging in percutaneous musculoskeletal interventions , 2009 .

[10]  Christian Hansen,et al.  Projector‐based augmented reality system for interventional visualization inside MRI scanners , 2018, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[11]  Michael Söderman,et al.  Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology , 2018, Spine.

[12]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 3 Image-Guided Navigation Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[13]  C. Scheiwe,et al.  Comparative Study of C-Arms for Intraoperative 3-dimensional Imaging and Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Part II: Radiation Exposure , 2014, Clinical spine surgery.

[14]  H. Aerts,et al.  Feasibility Study of Needle Placement in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Guidance Versus Conventional Fluoroscopy , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[15]  Ramin Javan,et al.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[16]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Augmented Reality–Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injections , 2018, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Augmented reality visualization using Image-Overlay for MR-guided interventions: system description, feasibility, and initial evaluation in a spine phantom. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  1.5 T augmented reality navigated interventional MRI: paravertebral sympathetic plexus injections. , 2017, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[19]  Luigi Solbiati,et al.  Augmented reality for interventional oncology: proof-of-concept study of a novel high-end guidance system platform , 2018, European Radiology Experimental.

[20]  G. Fichtinger,et al.  Augmented reality visualisation using an image overlay system for MR-guided interventions: technical performance of spine injection procedures in human cadavers at 1.5 Tesla , 2012, European Radiology.

[21]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Augmented Reality Visualization Using Image Overlay Technology for MR-Guided Interventions: Cadaveric Bone Biopsy at 1.5 T , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[22]  Priya Bhattacharji,et al.  Application of Real-Time 3D Navigation System in CT-Guided Percutaneous Interventional Procedures: A Feasibility Study , 2017, Radiology research and practice.

[23]  Simon Weidert,et al.  On-the-fly augmented reality for orthopedic surgery using a multimodal fiducial , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[24]  Bernhard Meyer,et al.  Revision Rate of Misplaced Pedicle Screws of the Thoracolumbar Spine-Comparison of Three-Dimensional Fluoroscopy Navigation with Freehand Placement: A Systematic Analysis and Review of the Literature. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[25]  A. Kandil,et al.  Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in vertically unstable pelvic injuries, a refined conventional method. , 2016, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[26]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Camera Augmented Mobile C-Arm (CAMC): Calibration, Accuracy Study, and Clinical Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Usefulness of cone-beam CT before and after percutaneous vertebroplasty. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Marcus Pfister,et al.  C-Arm Cone Beam Computed Tomography Needle Path Overlay for Fluoroscopic Guided Vertebroplasty , 2010, Spine.

[29]  S. Vertuani,et al.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[30]  A. Nanda,et al.  Impact of body habitus on fluoroscopic radiation emission during minimally invasive spine surgery. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[31]  Drazenko Babic,et al.  Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  M. V. van Strijen,et al.  Real-Time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  MR-Guided Vertebroplasty With Augmented Reality Image Overlay Navigation , 2014, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[34]  Manabu Ito,et al.  A novel 3D guidance system using augmented reality for percutaneous vertebroplasty: technical note. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[35]  F. Wang,et al.  Precision insertion of percutaneous sacroiliac screws using a novel augmented reality-based navigation system: a pilot study , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[36]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Evaluation and Integration of Genetic Signature for Prediction Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Southern China , 2014, BioMed research international.