Experimental evidence for female mate choice in a noctuid moth

[1]  W. Conner,et al.  17. Utetheisa ornatrix (Erebidae, Arctiinae): A Case Study of Sexual Selection , 2019 .

[2]  M. Egas,et al.  A life-history perspective on sexual selection in a polygamous species , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[3]  G. Cardoso,et al.  Choice of high‐quality mates versus avoidance of low‐quality mates , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Kristin Hudlow Mate Choice: The Evolution of Sexual Decision Making from Microbes to Humans , 2018, The American Biology Teacher.

[5]  A. Groot,et al.  Proximity of signallers can maintain sexual signal variation under stabilizing selection , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  D. Andow,et al.  Highly variable male courtship behavioral sequences in a crambid moth , 2017, Journal of Ethology.

[7]  M. Elgar,et al.  Diet-Mediated Pheromones and Signature Mixtures Can Enforce Signal Reliability , 2017, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[8]  S. Hosseini,et al.  Experimental evidence for chemical mate guarding in a moth , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Marco Gamba,et al.  BORIS: a free, versatile open‐source event‐logging software for video/audio coding and live observations , 2016 .

[10]  Seung-Joon Ahn,et al.  Tarsi of Male Heliothine Moths Contain Aldehydes and Butyrate Esters as Potential Pheromone Components , 2016, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  D. Edward,et al.  The description of mate choice , 2015 .

[12]  A. Classen,et al.  Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend: genetic basis and behavioural consequences , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Harari,et al.  The evolution of female sex pheromones , 2013 .

[14]  Devanand S. Manoli,et al.  Genetic and Neural Mechanisms that Inhibit Drosophila from Mating with Other Species , 2013, Cell.

[15]  N. Vickers,et al.  Hairpencil Volatiles Influence Interspecific Courtship and Mating Between Two Related Moth Species , 2011, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[16]  Jean-Marc Lassance,et al.  GENE GENEALOGIES REVEAL DIFFERENTIATION AT SEX PHEROMONE OLFACTORY RECEPTOR LOCI IN PHEROMONE STRAINS OF THE EUROPEAN CORN BORER, OSTRINIA NUBILALIS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  S. Lewis,et al.  The influence of male ejaculate quantity on female fitness: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  F. Gould,et al.  Functional characterization of pheromone receptors in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens , 2011, Insect molecular biology.

[19]  Stefan Schulz The Chemistry of Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals I , 2010 .

[20]  A. Classen,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in sexual communication signal of a noctuid moth , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[21]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Moths are not silent, but whisper ultrasonic courtship songs , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[23]  A. Groot,et al.  Size and Chemical Composition of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Spermatophores , 2009 .

[24]  Jean-Marc Lassance,et al.  Concerted evolution of male and female display traits in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis , 2009, BMC Biology.

[25]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Private ultrasonic whispering in moths , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[26]  R. Jackson,et al.  How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  J. Tumlinson,et al.  Differences in cuticular lipid composition of the antennae of Helicoverpa zea, Heliothis virescens, and Manduca sexta. , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[28]  P. Brakefield,et al.  The Male Sex Pheromone of the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an Evolutionary Analysis , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  M. Elgar,et al.  The evolution of pheromone diversity. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  J. Komdeur,et al.  The evolution of mutual ornamentation , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  R. Jackson,et al.  Male and Female Mate‐Choice Decisions by Evarcha culicivora, An East African Jumping Spider , 2007 .

[32]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Mate choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  R. Ueda,et al.  A female-biased expressed elongase involved in long-chain hydrocarbon biosynthesis and courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[35]  M. Pszczolkowski,et al.  On the functional significance of juvenile hormone in the accessory sex glands of male Heliothis virescens. , 2006, Journal of insect physiology.

[36]  J. Brunner,et al.  Courtship Behavior in Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis pyrusana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) , 2006 .

[37]  R. Lande,et al.  POPULATION GENETIC MODELS OF MALE AND MUTUAL MATE CHOICE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  N. Vickers,et al.  Physiology and glomerular projections of olfactory receptor neurons on the antenna of female Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) responsive to behaviorally relevant odors , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Mutual ornamentation, age and reproductive performance in the European starling , 2005 .

[40]  J. Ferveur Cuticular Hydrocarbons: Their Evolution and Roles in Drosophila Pheromonal Communication , 2005, Behavior genetics.

[41]  A. Velando,et al.  Male preference for female foot colour in the socially monogamous blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  Contrasting Mutual Sexual Selection on Homologous Signal Traits in Drosophila serrata , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[43]  E. Jacquin-Joly,et al.  INSECT OLFACTORY RECEPTORS: CONTRIBUTIONS OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TO CHEMICAL ECOLOGY , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[44]  H Breer,et al.  Genes encoding candidate pheromone receptors in a moth (Heliothis virescens). , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  N. Vickers,et al.  The role of heliothine hairpencil compounds in female Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) behavior and mate acceptance. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[46]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  SIGNAL TRAIT SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND MUTUAL SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA SERRATA , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  H. Kokko,et al.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  H. Breer,et al.  A divergent gene family encoding candidate olfactory receptors of the moth Heliothis virescens , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  R. Bonduriansky The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[50]  Z. Jin,et al.  Male accessory gland derived factors can stimulate oogenesis and enhance oviposition in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). , 2001, Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology.

[51]  C. LaMunyon,et al.  Sperm storage by females of the polyandrous noctuid moth Heliothis virescens , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  S. Weller,et al.  The evolution of chemical defences and mating systems in tiger moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) , 1999 .

[53]  N. Wedell,et al.  Non-fertile sperm delay female remating , 1999, Nature.

[54]  E. Forsgren,et al.  On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  F. Gould,et al.  Effects of Age and Size on Mating in Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Implications for Resistance Management , 1996 .

[56]  R. Johnstone,et al.  MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  A. Pilastro,et al.  Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility , 1996 .

[58]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Protein content of spermatophores in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[59]  Desmond B. A. Thompson,et al.  Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  C. Löfstedt Moth Pheromone Genetics and Evolution , 1993 .

[61]  A. Honěk,et al.  Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship , 1993 .

[62]  F. Hunter,et al.  Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird , 1993, Nature.

[63]  C. Sanders,et al.  MATING BEHAVIOR OF SPRUCE BUDWORM MOTHS, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (CLEM.) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) , 1992, The Canadian Entomologist.

[64]  T. Baker,et al.  Comparative study of courtship in twelve phycitine moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[65]  H. Mustaparta,et al.  Pheromone reception in tobacco budworm moth,heliothis virescens , 1990, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[66]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  T. Baker,et al.  Sex pheromone communication in the lepidoptera: New research progress , 1989, Experientia.

[68]  M. Birch,et al.  The courtship behavior of the cabbage moth,Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and the role of male hair-pencils , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[69]  A. Surlykke Hearing in Notodontid Moths: a Tympanic Organ with a Single Auditory Neurone , 1984 .

[70]  K. Haynes,et al.  Mate-Locating and Courtship Behaviors of the Artichoke Plume Moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) , 1984 .

[71]  J. Dickinson,et al.  Eunuchs: The Role of Apyrene Sperm in Lepidoptera? , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[72]  T. Eisner,et al.  Precopulatory sexual interaction in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): Role of a pheromone derived from dietary alkaloids , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[73]  J. Tumlinson,et al.  Analysis of the Reproductive Behavior of Heliothis virescens (F.) under Laboratory Conditions , 1981 .

[74]  P. Ellis,et al.  The mating behaviour of the egyptian cotton leafworm moth, spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  J. Engebretson,et al.  Transfer of 65Zn at Mating in Heliothis virescens , 1980 .

[76]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Courtship Behavior of the Oriental Fruit Moth (Grapholitha molesta) : Experimental Analysis and Consideration of the Role of Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Courtship Pheromones in the Lepidoptera , 1979 .

[77]  K. Hirai Observations on the Function of Male Scent Brushes and Mating Behavior in Leucania separata W. and Mamestra brassicae L. : Lepidoptera, Noctuidae , 1977 .

[78]  H. Shorey,et al.  Sex Pheromones of Lepidoptera: Examination of the Role of Male Scent Brushes in Courtship Behavior of Trichoplusia ni , 1976 .

[79]  D. E. Hendricks,et al.  Tobacco Budworm: Male Pheromone Suppressed Emission of Sex Pheromone by the Female , 1975 .

[80]  J. W. Snow,et al.  Tobacco Budworm: Effect of Prior Mating and Sperm Content on the Mating Behavior of Females , 1975 .

[81]  T. E. Pliske Courtship Behavior of the Monarch Butterfly, Danaus plexippus L. , 1975 .

[82]  J. Tumlinson,et al.  Tobacco Budworm: Production, Collection, and Use of Natural Pheromone in Field Traps , 1974 .

[83]  H. Ghiradella Fine structure of the noctuid moth ear. I. The transducer area and connections to the tympanic membrane in Feltia subgothica haworth , 1971, Journal of morphology.

[84]  R. Burton A low-cost artificial diet for the corn earworm. , 1970 .

[85]  G. Grant Evidence for a Male Sex Pheromone in the Noctuid, Trichoplusia ni , 1970, Nature.

[86]  H. Shorey Sex Pheromones of Noctuid Moths. II. Mating Behavior of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with Special Reference to the Role of the Sex Pheromone , 1964 .

[87]  Male Pheromones in Moths , 2016 .

[88]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[89]  A. Surlykke,et al.  Moth hearing and sound communication , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[90]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. , 2011, Annual review of entomology.

[91]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Insect hydrocarbons : biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology , 2010 .

[92]  S. Sane,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Antennal Mechanosensors Mediate Flight Control in Moths , 2007 .

[93]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Sexual Selection , 2005 .

[94]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  3.14 – Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Pheromone Production , 2005 .

[95]  T. Ando,et al.  Lepidopteran sex pheromones. , 2004, Topics in current chemistry.

[96]  R. Nishida Sequestration of defensive substances from plants by Lepidoptera. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[97]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: Lessons from two-sided matching , 2000 .

[98]  S. Shu,et al.  Mating in Heliothis virescens: transfer of juvenile hormone during copulation by male to female and stimulation of biosynthesis of endogenous juvenile hormone. , 1998, Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology.

[99]  Thomas C. Baker,et al.  Scents and Eversible Scent Structures of Male Moths , 1990 .

[100]  S. F. Henning Courtship and mating of butterflies , 1990 .

[101]  R. Charlton,et al.  Behavioral interactions in the courtship of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). , 1990 .

[102]  M. Simmonds,et al.  A behavioural and electrophysiological study of the role of tarsal chemoreceptors in feeding by adults of Spodoptera, Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa armigera , 1990 .

[103]  H. Spangler MOTH HEARING, DEFENSE, AND COMMUNICATION ! , 1988 .

[104]  P. H. Wells,et al.  Reproductive behavior in an overwintering aggregation of Monarch butterflies , 1976 .

[105]  A. Manning The sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans , 1959 .