Innovation, Networks and Plant Location: Some Evidence for Ireland

The influence of networks and location on plants' innovation activities has received considerable attention over the last decade. Most empirical work has centred on the hypotheses suggested by the urban hierarchy model. That is, that resource-rich, urban areas may be more conducive to product innovation while more rural areas are better suited to process change. This paper differentiates among four types of areas in Ireland (Urban, Urban-periphery, Rural, and Second Centre) and uses survey evidence to examine the impact of these different environments on plants' innovation activity. There are two main empirical conclusions. First, networks play an important part in determining the probability that plants will be innovative and, to a lesser extent, the success of that innovation. This provides some conditional support for recent calls for network-based regional development strategies. Secondly, there is no evidence of any urban hierarchy of innovation in Ireland, suggesting that regional policy initiatives...

[1]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Determinants of innovation : the message from new indicators , 1996 .

[2]  Paul Geroski,et al.  INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1990 .

[3]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[4]  J. Tomaney.  Recent developments in Irish industrial policy , 1995 .

[5]  Franz Tödtling,et al.  Technological Change at the Regional Level: The Role of Location, Firm Structure, and Strategy , 1992 .

[6]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1985 .

[7]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Local milieu and innovations: Some empirical results , 1998 .

[8]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Spatial Dispersion of Technological Innovation: A Review , 1997 .

[9]  J. Love,et al.  UK innovation policy : a critique , 1995 .

[10]  Spatial dispersion of technological innovation : a case study for the Netherlands by means of partial least squares , 1989 .

[11]  P. Teague,et al.  Workplace innovations in the Republic of Ireland , 1997 .

[12]  Richard C. Levin,et al.  Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure , 1984 .

[13]  Edward J. Malecki,et al.  Corporate Organization of R and D and the Location of Technological Activities , 1980 .

[14]  S. Roper,et al.  Innovation, Networks and the Diffusion of Manufacturing Best Practice , 1997 .

[15]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[16]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .

[17]  P. Wong.  Technological development through subcontracting linkages: Evidence from Singapore , 1992 .

[18]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland , 2001 .

[19]  J. Metcalfe.  Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework , 1995 .

[20]  Richard D. F. Harris.  Technology and regional policy: a case study of Northern Ireland , 1991 .

[21]  R. P. Oakey,et al.  High technology small firms : regional development in Britain and the United States , 1985 .

[22]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms , 1990 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[24]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  Modeling regional innovativeness and innovation , 1996 .

[25]  K. Koschatzky,et al.  Regional Concentration and Dynamics of Fast-growing Industries in Baden-Württemberg and Israel , 2000 .

[26]  Richard D. F. Harris,et al.  Innovations and R & D in Northern Ireland Manufacturing: A Schumpeterian Approach , 1995 .

[27]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants , 2001 .

[28]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[29]  J. Howells.  The location of research and development: Some observations and evidence from Britain , 1984 .

[30]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Operational models on industrial innovation and spatial development: a case study for the Netherlands , 1987 .

[31]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[32]  H. Görg,et al.  Linkages between multinationals and indigenous firms : evidence for the electronics sector in Ireland , 1998 .

[33]  Brian Ashcroft,et al.  Corporate structure, ownership and the likelihood of innovation , 1996 .

[34]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Different Paths to Success—The Growth of the Electronics Sector in Ireland and Israel , 2000 .

[35]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[36]  David M. Brock,et al.  Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development , 1998 .

[37]  D. Cogan,et al.  The Irish Experience with Literature-based Innovation Output Indicators , 1993 .

[38]  V. Smith,et al.  Does Location Matter for Firms' R&D Behaviour? Empirical Evidence for Danish Firms , 2002 .

[39]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Firm size, small business presence and sales of innovative products: A micro-econometric analysis , 1996 .

[40]  Charles Perrow,et al.  The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring. , 1991 .

[41]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Do Regions Matter for R&D? , 1992 .

[42]  Erik Brouwer,et al.  Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators , 1996 .