Scenario planning as communicative action: Lessons from participatory exercises conducted for the Scottish livestock industry

Based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, this paper critiques the transparency and legitimacy of participatory scenario planning, considering a case study of scenario development for the livestock industry within Scotland. The paper considers the extent to which the case study approximates the conditions for ‘ideal speech situations’ and how these conditions could be applied more widely in participatory scenario planning. The authors explore the rationale for participatory scenario planning within the science–policy interface with critical reference to the corporate context in which scenario planning has evolved. The aim is to optimise the potential for its use in the context of socio-technical and environmental governance. Researcher co-reflections on the case study are mapped within a matrix of indices representing conditions for ideal speech situations. Further analytical categories highlight the extent to which ideal speech was approximated. Although many of the constraints on achieving ideal speech situations reflect intransigent, practical logistics of organising participatory exercises, our novel approach enables the systematic identification of some important issues and provides a conceptual framework for understanding how they interrelate that may prove useful to practitioners and theorists alike.

[1]  Luc de Brabandere,et al.  Scenarios and creativity: Thinking in new boxes , 2010 .

[2]  Gisela WachingerOrtwin Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system? , 2014 .

[3]  C. Abbot,et al.  The Usual Suspects? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention , 2003 .

[4]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[5]  Axel Kommunikatives Handeln,et al.  Communicative Action Essays on Jèurgen Habermas's the Theory of Communicative Action , 1991 .

[6]  Heiko A. von der Gracht,et al.  The Future of Logistics: Scenarios for 2025 , 2008 .

[7]  Morrisette,et al.  Global environmental change : understanding the human dimensions , 1992 .

[8]  B. Bruno The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociol... , 2004 .

[9]  Frances A. O'Brien,et al.  Scenario planning - lessons for practice from teaching and learning , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  B. Wynne Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter “science”?: A response to Darrin Durant, “Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public” , 2008 .

[11]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Courage of Truth: The Government of Self and Others II; Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983-1984 , 2012 .

[12]  David A. Garvin,et al.  A Note on Scenario Planning , 2005 .

[13]  George Wright,et al.  Teaching scenario planning: Lessons from practice in academe and business , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  S. Shapin Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[15]  B. Heyman The GM debate: Risk, politics and public engagement , 2011 .

[16]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[17]  Betty S. Flowers The art and strategy of scenario writing , 2003 .

[18]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  What is social learning , 2010 .

[19]  Brian Wynne,et al.  The rhetoric of consensus politics: a critical review of technology assessment , 1993 .

[20]  K. Krippendorff Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[21]  C. Godfray,et al.  The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability , 2011 .

[22]  David W. Cash,et al.  Information as Influence: How Institutions Mediate the Impact of Scientific Assessments on Global Environmental Affairs , 2002 .

[23]  Howard White,et al.  Who counts? The power of participatory statistics , 2013 .

[24]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Reconceptualizing Participation for Sustainable Rural Development: Towards a Negotiation Approach , 2000 .

[25]  A. Franklin,et al.  Biosecurity, Expertise and the Institutional Void: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis , 2009 .

[26]  M. Eames,et al.  Community foresight for urban sustainability: Insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (SuScit) project , 2011 .

[27]  John Robinson,et al.  Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research , 2011 .

[28]  Samiran Nundy,et al.  Thinking the unthinkable! , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Scenarios : findings of the Scenarios Working Group, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[30]  James Miller Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[31]  Jiayi Liu,et al.  What Will the Scottish Cattle Industry Look Like in 2040 and How Resilient Will It Be to Livestock Disease , 2014 .

[32]  A. Stirling Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis , 2006 .

[33]  N. Thrift,et al.  Writing the Rural: Five Cultural Geographies , 1994 .

[34]  Robert E. Linneman,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios by U.S. industrial companies , 1979 .

[35]  Teresa Pinto-Correia,et al.  Social capital accumulation and the role of the researcher: An example of a transdisciplinary visioning process for the future of agriculture in Europe , 2015 .

[36]  S. Fast A Habermasian analysis of local renewable energy deliberations , 2013 .

[37]  Thomas Henrichs,et al.  Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments , 2007 .

[38]  M S Reed,et al.  Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Alan Irwin,et al.  Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe , 2006 .

[40]  Gill Ringland,et al.  Scenario Planning: Managing for the Future , 1998 .

[41]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Searching for the future of land: scenarios from the local to global scale , 2006 .

[42]  T. Pinto-Correia,et al.  Transdisciplinarity in deriving sustainability pathways for agriculture. , 2015 .

[43]  Woody Wade,et al.  Scenario Planning: A Field Guide to the Future , 2012 .

[44]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[45]  Yasushi Umeda,et al.  Research needs and challenges faced in supporting scenario design in sustainability science: a literature review , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[46]  J. Habermas,et al.  The theory of communicative action. Volume 2, Lifeworld andsystem : a critique of functionalist reason , 1989 .

[47]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[48]  K. Blackstock,et al.  Participatory research to influence participatory governance: managing relationships with planners , 2015 .

[49]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The birth of biopolitics : lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79 , 2010 .

[50]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment , 2010 .

[51]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[52]  Robert E. Linneman,et al.  The use of multiple scenarios by U.S. industrial companies: A comparison study, 1977–1981☆ , 1983 .

[53]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[54]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[55]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[56]  T. Honderich The Oxford Companion to Philosophy , 1995 .

[57]  Bruce V. Taylor Between argument and coercion: Social coordination in rural environmental governance , 2010 .

[58]  M. Hajer Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[59]  B. Wynne Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out? , 2002 .

[60]  David Thacher Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , 2005 .

[61]  Philippe Durance,et al.  Scenario building: Uses and abuses , 2010 .

[62]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning , 2003 .

[63]  Ian Wilson,et al.  The scenario-planning handbook : a practitioner's guide to developing and using scenarios to direct strategy in today's uncertain times , 2006 .

[64]  Audley Genus,et al.  Framing public engagement: A critical discourse analysis of GM Nation? , 2014 .

[65]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Scenario Planning in Organizations: How to Create, Use, and Assess Scenarios , 2011 .

[66]  A. Madanipour,et al.  Place, identity and local politics: analysing initiatives in deliberative governance , 2003 .

[67]  M. Godet,et al.  Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios , 1996 .

[68]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberating Competence , 2008 .

[69]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[70]  A. Benjamin Handler,et al.  What is Planning Theory , 1957 .

[71]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[72]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[73]  T. Heckelei,et al.  Global Environmental Change , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

[74]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[75]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[76]  D. Mitrany Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[77]  Robert Fildes Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[78]  M. Bevir ENCYCLOPEDIA OF GOVERNANCE I , 2007 .

[79]  L. Sutherland,et al.  Scenario planning: The future of the cattle and sheep industries in Scotland and their resiliency to disease. , 2015, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[80]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean , 2007 .

[81]  A. Irwin The Politics of Talk , 2006 .

[82]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Using participation to create resilience: how to involve citizens in designing a hospital system? , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[83]  Gerardo Reyes Guzmán The Future of Food and Farming: Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability , 2011 .

[84]  G. Gutting The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[85]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Stakeholder integrated research (STIR): a new approach tested in climate change adaptation research , 2015, Climatic Change.

[86]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[87]  W. Huss,et al.  Scenario planning—What style should you use? , 1987 .

[88]  A. Stirling “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[89]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  AN IMPACT IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION , 1988 .

[90]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[91]  Graham Murdock,et al.  The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement , 2007 .

[92]  J. Habermas The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system - A critique of functionalist reason , 1990 .

[93]  M. Weber “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy , 2017 .

[94]  D. Goodman,et al.  Jürgen Habermas' theory of communicative action: An incomplete project , 2001 .

[95]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[96]  Christian Rostboll,et al.  On Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[97]  Peter C. Bishop,et al.  The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques , 2007 .