The capital goods for collection and transport of waste were quantified for different types of containers (plastic containers, cubes and steel containers) and an 18-tonnes compacting collection truck. The data were collected from producers and vendors of the bins and the truck. The service lifetime and the capacity of the goods were also assessed. Environmental impact assessment of the production of the capital goods revealed that, per tonne of waste handled, the truck had the largest contribution followed by the steel container. Large high density polyethylene (HDPE) containers had the lowest impact per tonne of waste handled. The impact of producing the capital goods for waste collection and transport cannot be neglected as the capital goods dominate (>85%) the categories human-toxicity (non-cancer and cancer), ecotoxicity, resource depletion and aquatic eutrophication, but also play a role (>13%) within the other impact categories when compared with the impacts from combustion of fuels for the collection and transport of the waste, when a transport distance of 25 km was assumed.
[1]
Stig Irving Olsen,et al.
Normalization in EDIP97 and EDIP2003: updated European inventory for 2004 and guidance towards a consistent use in practice
,
2011
.
[2]
Thomas H. Christensen,et al.
Solid waste technology & management
,
2013
.
[3]
Thomas H Christensen,et al.
Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance
,
2009,
Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.
[4]
Stig Irving Olsen,et al.
Normalization references for Europe and North America for application with USEtox™ characterization factors
,
2011
.
[5]
X. Gabarrell,et al.
LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management.
,
2010,
Waste management.