Chapter 4 Bond Breaking in Quantum Chemistry

Publisher Summary This chapter describes the different aspects of bond breaking in quantum chemistry. Ab initio quantum chemical methods can predict the equilibrium properties of small molecules in the gas phase to near-spectroscopic accuracy. A detailed understanding of a chemical reaction often requires the knowledge of its dynamics, which in turn requires the knowledge of the potential energy surface. By allowing the alpha and beta electrons to occupy different orbitals, the wave function can avoid the unphysical ionic terms. This approach is called unrestricted “Hartree–Fock (UHF),” as opposed to the usual, restricted Hartree–Fock (RHF) method. The UHF potential energy curve is qualitatively correct, but often quantitatively poor. It also has the rather undesirable property that it is not an Eigen function of the electronic spin operator. CASSCF is the most widely used quantum chemical method for bond-breaking reactions. CASSCF wave functions are usually easier to converge than general multiconfigurational self-consistent-field (MCSCF) wave functions and the ambiguity of selecting individual configurations is removed. The problematic ionic terms that make the RHF energy too high for large separations can also be avoided by using nonorthogonal orbitals in the valence bond approach.

[1]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Perturbative corrections to the equation-of-motion spin–flip self-consistent field model: Application to bond-breaking and equilibrium properties of diradicals , 2002 .

[2]  Josef Paldus,et al.  N-reference, M-state coupled-cluster method: Merging the state-universal and reduced multireference coupled-cluster theories , 2003 .

[3]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  Full configuration interaction potential energy curves for the X 1Σg+, B 1Δg, and B′ 1Σg+ states of C2: A challenge for approximate methods , 2004 .

[4]  Peter Pulay,et al.  The unrestricted natural orbital–complete active space (UNO–CAS) method: An inexpensive alternative to the complete active space–self‐consistent‐field (CAS–SCF) method , 1989 .

[5]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  The Configuration Interaction Method: Advances in Highly Correlated Approaches , 1999 .

[6]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  The restricted active space self-consistent-field method, implemented with a split graph unitary group approach , 1990 .

[7]  Michael J. McGuire,et al.  Recent advances in electronic structure theory: Method of moments of coupled-cluster equations and renormalized coupled-cluster approaches , 2002 .

[8]  Y. Osamura,et al.  Isotope effect of hydrogen and lithium hydride molecules. Application of the dynamic extended molecular orbital method and energy component analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Michael W. Schmidt,et al.  The construction and interpretation of MCSCF wavefunctions. , 1998, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[10]  William A. Goddard,et al.  GVB–RP: A reliable MCSCF wave function for large systems , 1999 .

[11]  Kerstin Andersson,et al.  Multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory , 1995 .

[12]  P. Knowles,et al.  A second order multiconfiguration SCF procedure with optimum convergence , 1985 .

[13]  H. Nakai.  Simultaneous determination of nuclear and electronic wave functions without Born–Oppenheimer approximation: Ab initio NO+MO/HF theory , 2002 .

[14]  K. Freed,et al.  The improved virtual orbital-complete active space configuration interaction method, a “packageable” efficient ab initio many-body method for describing electronically excited states , 2001 .

[15]  John F. Stanton,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF AN ASYMMETRIC TRIPLE-EXCITATION CORRECTION FOR COUPLED-CLUSTER ENERGIES , 1998 .

[16]  S. Chattopadhyay,et al.  State-specific multi-reference perturbation theories with relaxed coefficients: molecular applications , 2002 .

[17]  S. Pal,et al.  Use of Cluster Expansion Methods in the Open-Shell Correlation Problem , 1989 .

[18]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Size-consistent wave functions for nondynamical correlation energy: The valence active space optimized orbital coupled-cluster doubles model , 1998 .

[19]  Michael W. Schmidt,et al.  Are atoms intrinsic to molecular electronic wavefunctions? I. The FORS model , 1982 .

[20]  Edward F. Valeev,et al.  The electron and nuclear orbitals model: current challenges and future prospects , 2004 .

[21]  W. Goddard,et al.  The Self-Consistent Field Equations for Generalized Valence Bond and Open-Shell Hartree—Fock Wave Functions , 1977 .

[22]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  The spin–flip approach within time-dependent density functional theory: Theory and applications to diradicals , 2003 .

[23]  Antara Dutta,et al.  Full configuration interaction potential energy curves for breaking bonds to hydrogen: An assessment of single-reference correlation methods , 2003 .

[24]  Hans Ågren,et al.  A direct, restricted-step, second-order MC SCF program for large scale ab initio calculations , 1986 .

[25]  P. Knowles,et al.  An efficient internally contracted multiconfiguration–reference configuration interaction method , 1988 .

[26]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Size-consistent wave functions for bond-breaking: the equation-of-motion spin-flip model , 2001 .

[27]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  A spin-complete version of the spin-flip approach to bond breaking: What is the impact of obtaining spin eigenfunctions? , 2003 .

[28]  C. David Sherrill,et al.  An assessment of the accuracy of multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) and complete-active-space second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) for breaking bonds to hydrogen , 2003 .

[29]  L. Adamowicz,et al.  Non-Born–Oppenheimer calculations of atoms and molecules , 2003 .

[30]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Spin-flip configuration interaction: an electronic structure model that is both variational and size-consistent , 2001 .

[31]  Ernest R. Davidson,et al.  MULTI-REFERENCE PERTURBATION THEORY , 1999 .

[32]  S. P. Webb,et al.  Multiconfigurational nuclear-electronic orbital approach: Incorporation of nuclear quantum effects in electronic structure calculations , 2002 .

[33]  Martin Head-Gordon,et al.  A perturbative correction to the quadratic coupled-cluster doubles method for higher excitations , 2002 .

[34]  H. Schaefer.  Methods of Electronic Structure Theory , 1977 .