Machine shop information model application, next step

Simulation is defined as the imitation of the operation of a system or real-world process over time, and in many cases, manufacturing provides one of the most important applications of simulation (Zolfaghari and Roa, 2006). Standard interfaces could make information effective sharing, and hence promote the utilization of simulators. An information model (McLean et al., 2005), which represents machine shop data and facilitates data sharing among machine shop’s manufacturing execution system, scheduling system, and simulation system, has been developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Recently NIST researchers in collaboration with industrial partners have been working on a standards development effort titled Core Manufacturing Simulation Data (CMSD) Product Development Group (PDG) under the guidelines, policies and procedures of the Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO). A key activity of the CMSD PDG is to develop a CMSD information model using the machine shop information model as the strawman. This paper briefs the machine shop information model and the CMSD information model. This paper discusses information exchange, using NIST’s information model, between different representations and presents an algorithm to exchange data between a database system and an eXtensible Markup Language (XML) [1] document. The algorithm has been built based on Document Object Model (DOM), XML Path Language (XPath), and Open Database Connectivity Database Engine (ODBC). The paper also describes interfaces for XML schema’s validation, structured query, and data transfer.

[1]  Yan Luo,et al.  A Database Application for Manufacturing Simulation System Integration , 2004 .

[2]  Mohsen Rezayat,et al.  Knowledge-based product development using XML and KCs , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  Saeed Zolfaghari,et al.  Cellular manufacturing versus a hybrid system: a comparative study , 2006 .

[4]  Charles R. McLean,et al.  An architecture for a generic data-driven machine shop simulator , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[5]  J. Freire,et al.  Managing XML data: an abridged overview , 2004, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[6]  C. Harrell,et al.  Simulation modeling using PROMODEL technology , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[7]  Y. Tina Lee,et al.  INFORMATION MODELING : FROM DESIGN TO IMPLEMENTATION , 1999 .

[8]  Simon St. Laurent,et al.  XML: A Primer , 1998 .

[9]  Yan Luo,et al.  Application of Machine Shop Data Model in Manufacturing Simulation , 2005, MSV.

[10]  Charles R. Harrell,et al.  Simulation modeling using ProModel technology , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[11]  Yan Luo,et al.  CHIP FORMATION ANALYSIS FOR HIGH SPEED CUTTING , 2003 .

[12]  Frank Manola Technologies for a Web Object Model , 1999, IEEE Internet Comput..

[13]  Rubin H. Landau,et al.  Future scientific digital documents with MathML, XML, and SVG , 2002, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[14]  Charles R. McLean,et al.  Shop Data Model and Interface Specification , 2005 .

[15]  Katherine C. Morris,et al.  XML Schema Validation Process for CORE.GOV , 2004 .

[16]  James Allan,et al.  A survey in indexing and searching XML documents , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Y. Luo,et al.  Parametric tool wear estimation solution of HSC appropriate machining , 2004 .