Improved Human-Robot Teaming through Facilitated Initiative

This paper evaluates collaborative tasking tools that facilitate dynamic sharing of responsibilities between robot and operator throughout a search and detection task. The goal is to arbitrate human and robot initiative such that the user can provide input at different levels without interfering with the robot's ability to navigate, avoid obstacles, plan global paths, and achieve task goals. A real-world search and detection experiment is used to compare standard shared mode (SSM), where robot behavior unfolds from the robot's perception of its local environment and the attainment of task goals are the result of continuous operator supervision, to a collaborative tasking mode (CTM), where operators input mission level tasks and the system dynamically constrains user and robot initiative based on the task element. Participants who utilize CTM do not experience a significant performance penalty, yet benefit from reduced workload and fewer instances of confusion. In addition, CTM participants report a higher overall feeling of control as compared to those using SSM

[1]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  "I call shotgun!": an evaluation of mixed-initiative control for novice users of a search and rescue robot , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[2]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Toward a warfighter’s associate: eliminating the operator control unit , 2004, SPIE Optics East.

[3]  Hobart R. Everett,et al.  Enhancing functionality and autonomy in man-portable robots , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence. , 1977 .

[5]  D. Conley,et al.  Facilitative Leadership: How Principals Lead without Dominating. , 1994 .

[6]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  Shared understanding for collaborative control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  "Turn Off the Television!": Real-World Robotic Exploration Experiments with a Virtual 3-D Display , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Comparing the usefulness of video and map information in navigation tasks , 2006, HRI '06.

[9]  Douglas A. Few,et al.  Lessons learned from usability tests with a collaborative cognitive workspace for human-robot teams , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[10]  William D. Smart,et al.  The Remote Exploration Program: a collaborative outreach approach to robotics education , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Improved interfaces for human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[12]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction with human-robot teams , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[13]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Moonlight in Miami: a field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise , 2004 .

[14]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.