Assessing FPAR source and parameter optimization scheme in application of a diagnostic carbon flux model

The combination of satellite remote sensing and carbon cycle models provides an opportunity for regional to global scale monitoring of terrestrial gross primary production, ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem production. FPAR (the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the plant canopy) is a critical input to diagnostic models, however little is known about the relative effectiveness of FPAR products from different satellite sensors nor about the sensitivity of flux estimates to different parameterization approaches. In this study, we used multiyear observations of carbon flux at four eddy covariance flux tower sites within the conifer biome to evaluate these factors. FPAR products from the MODIS and SeaWiFS sensors, and the effects of single site vs. cross-site parameter optimization were tested with the CFLUX model. The SeaWiFs FPAR product showed greater dynamic range across sites and resulted in slightly reduced flux estimation errors relative to the MODIS product when using cross-site optimization. With site-specific parameter optimization, the flux model was effective in capturing seasonal and interannual variation in the carbon fluxes at these sites. The cross-site prediction errors were lower when using parameters from a cross-site optimization compared to parameter sets from optimization at single sites. These results support the practice of multisite optimization within a biome or ecoregion for parameterization of diagnostic carbon flux models.

[1]  Wade K. Smith,et al.  The Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests , 1995 .

[2]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[3]  M. Williams,et al.  Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? , 1998, Tree physiology.

[4]  H. Kanis,et al.  On Validation , 1994 .

[5]  Robert E. Wolfe,et al.  An Algorithm to Produce Temporally and Spatially Continuous MODIS-LAI Time Series , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[7]  W. Silver,et al.  Simple three‐pool model accurately describes patterns of long‐term litter decomposition in diverse climates , 2008 .

[8]  T. Andrew Black,et al.  Carbon dioxide fluxes in coastal Douglas-fir stands at different stages of development after clearcut harvesting , 2006 .

[9]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  A diagnostic carbon flux model to monitor the effects of disturbance and interannual variation in climate on regional NEP , 2006 .

[10]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  W. Oechel,et al.  Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements , 2001 .

[12]  W. Oechel,et al.  Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation , 2002 .

[13]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements , 2004 .

[14]  Feng Gao,et al.  Temporally smoothed and gap‐filled MODIS land products for carbon modelling: application of the fPAR product , 2009 .

[15]  W. Cohen,et al.  Site‐level evaluation of satellite‐based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring , 2005 .

[16]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Cross-site evaluation of eddy covariance GPP and RE decomposition techniques , 2008 .

[17]  W. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation products for different canopy radiation transfer regimes: methodology and results using Joint Research Center products derived from SeaWiFS against ground-based estimations. , 2006 .

[18]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of land CO2 fluxes estimated with remote sensing and analysis data over western Eurasia , 2002 .

[19]  N. Gobron,et al.  Uncertainty Estimates for the FAPAR Operational Products Derived from MERIS - Impact of Top-of-Atmosphere Radiance Uncertainties and Validation with Field Data , 2008 .

[20]  S. Gower,et al.  Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Rasmus Fensholt,et al.  Evaluating MODIS, MERIS, and VEGETATION vegetation indices using in situ measurements in a semiarid environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  D. Turner,et al.  Integrating Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Process Models for Landscape- to Regional-Scale Analysis of the Carbon Cycle , 2004 .

[23]  K. Hibbard,et al.  A Global Terrestrial Monitoring Network Integrating Tower Fluxes, Flask Sampling, Ecosystem Modeling and EOS Satellite Data , 1999 .

[24]  W. Cohen,et al.  Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data , 2001 .

[25]  Dirk Pflugmacher,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 7-2006 MODIS land cover and LAI Collection 4 product quality across nine sites in the western hemisphere , 2018 .

[26]  S. Ustin,et al.  Flux partitioning in an old-growth forest: seasonal and interannual dynamics. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[27]  J. Randerson,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data , 1993 .

[28]  Robert Clement,et al.  On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Middleton,et al.  Regional mapping of gross light-use efficiency using MODIS spectral indices , 2008 .

[30]  P. Stenberg.  Correcting LAI-2000 estimates for the clumping of needles in shoots of conifers , 1996 .

[31]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data , 2004 .

[32]  B. Law,et al.  Interannual variation in soil CO2 efflux and the response of root respiration to climate and canopy gas exchange in mature ponderosa pine , 2008 .

[33]  R. O L A D A I R * W, W I L L I A,et al.  Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates , 2008 .

[34]  Russell K. Monson,et al.  Coupling between carbon cycling and climate in a high-elevation, subalpine forest: a model-data fusion analysis , 2007, Oecologia.

[35]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[36]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[37]  O. Lange.  Ecosystem processes : mineral cycling, productivity and man's influence , 1983 .

[38]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) , 2008 .

[39]  F. Woodward.  Ecophysiological Controls of Conifer Distributions , 1995 .

[40]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[41]  Per Jönsson,et al.  TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[42]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[43]  Eero Nikinmaa,et al.  Developing an empirical model of stand GPP with the LUE approach: analysis of eddy covariance data at five contrasting conifer sites in Europe , 2007 .

[44]  S. Running,et al.  Global Terrestrial Gross and Net Primary Productivity from the Earth Observing System , 2000 .

[45]  W. Oechel,et al.  A new model of gross primary productivity for North American ecosystems based solely on the enhanced vegetation index and land surface temperature from MODIS , 2008 .

[46]  Christoph Thomas,et al.  Seasonal hydrology explains interannual and seasonal variation in carbon and water exchange in a semiarid mature ponderosa pine forest in central Oregon , 2009 .