Environmental life cycle assessment of the microfiltration process

Abstract Membrane technology is being increasingly used in the treatment of waters and wastewaters. The two main costs associated with the adoption of membrane filtration are the membrane module cost and the energy cost. Tradeoffs between selection of membrane capital cost and energy cost are usually identified for process optimisation; however, environmental tradeoffs associated with different operating conditions have received less attention. In order to ensure the sustainable use of membrane filtration, environmental considerations should also influence the choice of operating conditions. Here, we report on application of the method of life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental performance of different operating conditions of a microfiltration membrane (MF) process. Different membrane chemical cleaning options are compared in the sensitivity analysis component of the study. The results show that operating the MF process at a low flux with a high maximum transmembrane pressure (TMPmax) offers the most environmentally favourable outcome. The sensitivity analysis results show that in the low flux range, the choice of chemical cleaning frequency can affect the overall environmental performance of the process.

[1]  H. Jönsson,et al.  Including oxidisation of ammonia in the eutrophication impact category , 2001 .

[2]  Colin Reith,et al.  Membranes enabling the affordable and cost effective reuse of wastewater as an alternative water source , 1998 .

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment of a Sewage‐Treatment Plant in South‐East Asia , 2000 .

[5]  M. Masson,et al.  Membrane filtration and reverse osmosis purification of sewage: Secondary effluent for re-use at Eraring Power Station , 1996 .

[6]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Aspects of microfiltration and reverse osmosis in municipal wastewater reuse , 1996 .

[7]  A. Tillman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal waste water systems , 1998 .

[8]  David Evans,et al.  Excluding site-specific data from the lca inventory: how this affects life cycle impact assessment , 2002 .

[9]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Assessing Management Options for Wastewater Treatment Works in the Context of Life Cycle Assessment. , 1998 .

[10]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[11]  E Friedrich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an industrial water recycling plant. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  John N. Lester,et al.  The Life-Cycle Analysis of Small-Scale Sewage-Treatment Processes , 1995 .

[13]  A G Fane,et al.  Analysis of microfiltration performance with constant flux processing of secondary effluent. , 2001, Water research.

[14]  Thomas D. Waite,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Recycling Technology , 2005 .

[15]  Anthony G. Fane.  Membranes for water production and wastewater reuse , 1996 .

[16]  R. Gnirss,et al.  Microfiltration of Municipal Wastewater for Disinfection and Advanced Phosphorus Removal: Results from Trials with Different Small‐Scale Pilot Plants , 2000 .