Transforming a Large-Class Lecture Course to a Smaller-Group Interactive Course

Objective. To transition a large pharmacokinetics course that was delivered using a traditional lecture format into a smaller-group course with a discussion format. Design. An e-book and Web-based multimedia learning modules were utilized to facilitate students' independent learning which allowed the number of classes they were required to attend to be reduced from 3 to 1 per week. Students were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 weekly class sessions. The majority of lecture time was replaced with active-learning activities including discussion, problem solving, and case studies to encourage higher-order learning. Assessment. Changes in course delivery were assessed over a 4-year period by comparing students' grades and satisfaction ratings on course evaluations. Although student satisfaction with the course did not improve significantly, students preferred the smaller-group setting to a large lecture-based class. The resources and activities designed to shift responsibility for learning to the students did not affect examination grades even though a larger portion of examination questions focused on higher orders of learning (eg, application) in the smaller-group format. Conclusions. Transitioning to a smaller-group discussion format is possible in a pharmacokinetics course by increasing student accountability for acquiring factual content outside of the classroom. Students favored the smaller-class format over a large lecture-based class.

[1]  H. Hassel,et al.  The Dea(r)th of Student Responsibility , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher Jepsen,et al.  Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement: The Potential Tradeoff between Teacher Quality and Class Size , 2012 .

[3]  J. Zull The art of changing the brain : enriching teaching by exploring the biology of learning , 2002 .

[4]  Paul M. Biner,et al.  The Impact of Remote-Site Group Size on Student Satisfaction and Relative Performance in Interactive Telecourses , 1997 .

[5]  L. M. Aleamoni Student Rating Myths Versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998 , 1999 .

[6]  Christine A. Stanley,et al.  Engaging Large Classes: Strategies and Techniques for College Faculty , 2001 .

[7]  K. Mattick,et al.  High‐quality learning: harder to achieve than we think? , 2007, Medical education.

[8]  Barbara J. Millis,et al.  Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty , 1997 .

[9]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Roles of innovation in education delivery. , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[10]  Peter Kuhn,et al.  Making Nutritional Information Digestible : Effects of a Receipt-Based Intervention on Fast Food Purchases , 2013 .

[11]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Class Size and Student Achievement: Small Effects of Small Classes , 1989 .

[12]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[13]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[14]  David Nicol,et al.  Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers , 1994 .

[15]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[16]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading Rate: Theory, Research, and Practical Implications. , 1992 .