Information technology in watershed management decision making

: Watershed management decision making is a complex process. Cooperation and communication among federal, state, and local stakeholders is required while balancing biophysical and socioeconomic concerns. The public is taking part in environmental decisions, and the need for technology transfer from public agencies to stakeholders is increasing. Information technology has had a profound influence on watershed management over the past decade. Advances in data acquisition through remote sensing, data utilization through geographic information systems (GIS), and data sharing through the Internet have provided watershed managers access to more information for management decisions. In the future, applications incorporating hydrologic simulation models, GIS, and decision support systems will be deployed through the Internet. In addition to challenges in making complex modeling technology available to diverse audiences, new information technology issues, such as interoperability, Internet access, and security, are introduced when GIS, simulation models, and decision support systems are integrated in an Internet environment. This paper presents a review of current use of information technology in watershed management decision making and a discussion of issues created when developing Internet based, integrated watershed management decision support systems. A prototype spatial decision support system (SDSS) for rangeland watershed management was developed using web services, which are components that communicate using text based messages, thus eliminating proprietary protocols. This new framework provides an extensible, accessible, and interoperable approach for SDSS.

[1]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  GIS-based Hydrologic Modeling: The Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment Tool , 2002 .

[2]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  KINEROS - a kinematic runoff and erosion model , 1995 .

[3]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  Modeling Runoff Response to Land Cover and Rainfall Spatial Variability in Semi-Arid Watersheds , 2000 .

[4]  Edward P. Weber,et al.  Ecosystem management, decentralization, and public opinion , 2001 .

[5]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Handbook of Hydrology , 1993 .

[6]  Steve Carver,et al.  Using GIS on the Internet for Planning , 1999 .

[7]  Angela Lee,et al.  Perspectives on … Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc , 1997 .

[8]  Jurgen D. Garbrecht,et al.  GIS and Distributed Watershed Models. II: Modules, Interfaces, and Models , 2001 .

[9]  Megan Mehaffey,et al.  INTEGRATING LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT AND HYDROLOGIC MODELING FOR LAND COVER CHANGE ANALYSIS 1 , 2002 .

[10]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[11]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[12]  Brandon Plewe GIS Online: Information Retrieval, Mapping, and the Internet , 1997 .

[13]  Michael Stal,et al.  Web services: beyond component-based computing , 2002, CACM.

[14]  Chloë Palmer Abstracts of Recent Articles and Literature , 2000 .

[15]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  The Evolution of Public Participation GIS , 1998 .

[16]  Jurgen D. Garbrecht,et al.  GIS and Distributed Watershed Models II , 2001 .

[17]  Peter M. Chapman New Strategies for America's Watersheds. National Research Council (1999). National Academy Press, Washington, DC. , 2000 .

[18]  Zhong-ren Peng,et al.  Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks , 2003 .