Complementarity and substitutability: A review of state level renewable energy policy instrument interactions

This paper provides an extensive review of two streams of literature: the first part of the review focuses on policy tools and their interrelationships and the second part focuses on the literature on the state renewable energy policy tools. Based on the reviews, this paper investigates how policymakers choose a set of interrelated renewable energy policy instruments and identify under what conditions policy instruments complement or substitute. We extend the political market framework by examining the influences of: (1) administrative agencies on the supply side; (2) interest groups on the demand side; and (3) the policy-induced problem situation changes on the adoption of state renewable energy policy tools, building upon reviews of both policy tools and policy diffusion theories. A set of hypotheses are advanced for state renewable energy policy interactions among public benefit fund (PBF), renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and corporate tax incentive (CTI). The hypotheses are tested by three Event History models, in which RPS, PBF and CTI serve as dependent variables separately. The complementary effects between previous use of RPS and adoption of PBF, between previous use of PBF and adoption of RPS, and between previous use of CTI and adoption of RPS are confirmed. We also find support for the policy substitutability between previous use of CTI and adoption of PBF.

[1]  John Byrne,et al.  American policy conflict in the greenhouse: Divergent trends in federal, regional, state, and local green energy and climate change policy , 2007 .

[2]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy , 2009 .

[3]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Public policy instruments : evaluating the tools of public administration , 1998 .

[4]  Hui Li,et al.  Multilevel governance and deployment of solar PV panels in U.S. cities , 2014 .

[5]  J. Alavalapati,et al.  Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random , 2007 .

[6]  Hongtao Yi.  Green businesses in a clean energy economy: Analyzing drivers of green business growth in U.S. states , 2014 .

[7]  H. Molotch.  The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Renewable Energy Politics: Policy Typologies, Policy Tools, and State Deployment of Renewables , 2014 .

[9]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments , 2007 .

[10]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts , 1989, Journal of Public Policy.

[11]  Larry Lyon,et al.  Community Power and Population Increase: An Empirical Test of the Growth Machine Model , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  R. Wiser,et al.  The renewables portfolio standard in Texas: an early assessment , 2001 .

[13]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard , 1996 .

[14]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[15]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Climate action plan adoptions in the US states , 2015 .

[16]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[17]  Gary D. Libecap,et al.  Contracting for Property Rights: Series editors' preface , 1990 .

[18]  S. Gouchoe,et al.  Case Studies on the Effectiveness of State Financial Incentives for Renewable Energy , 2002 .

[19]  R. Wiser,et al.  Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States , 2005 .

[20]  Rachel Brewster.  Stepping Stone or Stumbling Block: Incrementalism and National Climate Change Legislation , 2010 .

[21]  Barry G. Rabe,et al.  States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Climate Policy , 2008 .

[22]  Fredric C. Menz,et al.  The effectiveness of different policy regimes for promoting wind power: Experiences from the states , 2006 .

[23]  António F. Tavares,et al.  Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation , 2008 .

[24]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Credible Commitment and Council-Manager Government: Implications for Policy Instrument Choices , 2003 .

[25]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Clean energy policies and green jobs: An evaluation of green jobs in U.S. metropolitan areas , 2013 .

[26]  Roberto J. Cavazos.  The Political Economy of Electricity Deregulation: Appointed vs. Elected Utility Commissioners , 2003 .

[27]  Michael S. Lund.  Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action , 1990 .

[28]  J. Stoutenborough,et al.  Encouraging Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies , 2008 .

[29]  A Multilevel Governance and Growth Management , 2014 .

[30]  K. Palmer,et al.  COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY POLICIES , 2005 .

[31]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Clean-energy policies and electricity sector carbon emissions in the U.S. states , 2015 .

[32]  M. Lubell,et al.  Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments , 2005 .

[33]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[34]  Jess Chandler,et al.  Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? , 2009 .

[35]  O. Rentz,et al.  Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects--a multi-perspective evaluation approach , 2002 .

[36]  R. Feiock.  A Political Market Explanation for Policy Change , 2007 .

[37]  William D. Berry,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[38]  Edgar E. Ramírez de la Cruz,et al.  Local Political Institutions and Smart Growth An Empirical Study of the Politics of Compact Development , 2009 .

[39]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Innovation Diffusion in a Dynamic Potential Adopter Population , 1978 .

[40]  A. Vining,et al.  Policy analysis : concepts and practice , 1989 .

[41]  F. Menz.  Green electricity policies in the United States : case study , 2005 .

[42]  R. Feiock.  Explaining the Choice of Policy Instruments for State Environmental Protection: A Political Economy Approach , 1998 .

[43]  Cristina E. Ciocirlan.  Analysing preferences towards economic incentives in combating climate change: a comparative analysis of US states , 2008 .

[44]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[45]  J. Cummings.  DSIRE: Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency , 2013 .

[46]  William M. Bowen,et al.  Empirical Estimates of the Influence of Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards on the Green Economies of States , 2013 .

[47]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[48]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[49]  Daniel C. Matisoff.  The Adoption of State Climate Change Policies and Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2008 .