Contact allergy epidemics and their controls *

Contact dermatitis can be severe and lead to sick leave as well as significant healthcare expenses. The aim of this review is to present the published knowledge on 6 historical epidemics of contact allergy to apply this knowledge on the prevention and control of future contact allergy epidemics. A historical review is performed on nickel, chromium, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, formaldehyde, and para‐phenylenediamine. The first cases of contact dermatitis are mostly occupational, whereas consumer cases appear later. There is often a latency period from the first cases are observed until an epidemic occurs, and the problem is recognized. Finally, no one seems to take responsibility of dealing with the situation, and there are no attempts of regulation until an epidemic is consolidated among consumers for many years. Steps should be taken to prevent contact allergy epidemics. It is essential that dermatologist, scientists, administrators, and consumers organize and structure known methods to accelerate the control of emerging contact allergens.

[1]  P. Frosch,et al.  Allergic reactions to a hairdressers’series: results from 9 European centres , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  J. Geier,et al.  Downward Trend of Sensitization to Glyceryl Monothioglycolate in German Hairdressers1 , 2000, Dermatology.

[3]  A. Tosti,et al.  Provocative use testing of methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a cosmetic shampoo , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  T. Menné,et al.  Patch test reactivity to nickel alloys , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  G F Gerberick,et al.  The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  H. Jaeger,et al.  Tests épicutanés aux bichromates, positifs dans I’eczéma au ciment , 1950 .

[7]  A. Dillarstone.  Cosmetic preservatives , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  Marcussen Pv.  Contact dermatitis due to formaldehyde in textiles 1934-1958. Preliminary report. , 1959 .

[9]  H. Maibach,et al.  The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. , 1974, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[10]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Sensitization studies in the guinea pig with the active ingredients of Euxyl® K 400 , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  T. Menné,et al.  Contact dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone in a paint factory , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  A. Tosti,et al.  Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: the Italian experience. Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali. , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  T. Menné,et al.  Nickel sensitization from ear piercing , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  P. Marcussen.  Contact dermatitis due to formaldehyde in textiles 1934-1958. Preliminary report. , 1959, Acta Dermato-Venereologica.

[15]  S. Fregert.  [Chemical demonstration of paraphenylene diamine in hair dyes]. , 1972, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[16]  A. Dirksen,et al.  Allergic contact sensitization in an adult Danish population: two cross-sectional surveys eight years apart (the Copenhagen Allergy Study). , 2001, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[17]  F. Brandrup,et al.  Nickel dermatitis provoked by buttons in blue jeans , 1979, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  G. N. Flint.  A metallurgical approach to metal contact dermatitis , 1998, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Kathon biocide: manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[21]  J. Johansen,et al.  Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse‐off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  J. W. Weyland,et al.  Kathon® CG: cosmetic allergy and patch test sensitization , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  T. Menné,et al.  Regulation of nickel exposure in Denmark , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  R. Carney.  Marketing and Use of Dangerous Substances , 1991 .

[25]  W. Erhardt,et al.  Anaphylaxiestudien bei Mensch und Tier , 1927 .

[26]  M. Flyvholm.  Preservatives in registered chemical products , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[27]  J. Geier,et al.  Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients – an 8‐year analysis of IVDK * data , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[28]  C. Goose,et al.  Glossary of Terms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[29]  J. Hentz,et al.  The contact allergen replacement database and treatment of allergic contact dermatitis. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[30]  S. Seidenari,et al.  Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[31]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[32]  T. Agner,et al.  Individual Predisposition to Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 2001 .

[33]  T. Fuchs,et al.  Typ IV-Allergien auf Friseurberufsstoffe. Ergebnisse einer multizentrisc hen Studie in acht Kliniken der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe und des «Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken» in Deutschland , 1994 .

[34]  C. Zachariae,et al.  An evaluation of dose/unit area and time as key factors influencing the elicitation capacity of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) in MCI/MI‐allergic patients , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[35]  J. W. Weyland,et al.  Methyldibromoglutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in The Netherlands , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[36]  A. Tosti.  Prevalence and sources of Kathon CG sensitization in Italy , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[37]  J. Montelius,et al.  Sensitizing potential in mice, guinea pig and man of the preservative Euxyl® K 400 and its ingredient methyldibromo glutaronitrile , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[38]  Methylbenzylidene Camphor.  OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS , 2001 .

[39]  C. T. Mathias,et al.  Contact dermatitis to a new biocide (Tektamer 38®) used in a paste glue formulation , 1983, Contact dermatitis.

[40]  J. Görtz,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from Euxyl K 400 , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[41]  R. Waeber,et al.  Preservation of products with MCI/MI in Switzerland , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[42]  O. Baadsgaard,et al.  Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel‐exposure regulation , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[43]  T. Menné,et al.  Permanent disability from skin diseases. A study of 564 patients registered over a six year period. , 1979, Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment.

[44]  S. Fregert,et al.  Release of nickel from silver coins. , 1974, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[45]  J. Boyle,et al.  Contact dermatitis from phenoxyethanol in aqueous cream BP , 1984, Contact dermatitis.

[46]  R. Rycroft,et al.  Occupational sensitization to p‐phenylenediamine: a 17‐year review , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[47]  J. Johansen,et al.  Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985–86 and 1997–98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[48]  J. Johansen,et al.  Contact dermatitis to hair dyes in a Danish adult population: an interview‐based study , 2005, The British journal of dermatology.

[49]  A. Kligman.  Full Length ReportThe Identification of Contact Allergens by Human Assay: III. The Maximization Test: A Procedure for Screening and Rating Contact Sensitizers* , 1966 .

[50]  A. Schittenhelm,et al.  Anaphylaxiestudien bei Mensch und Tier , 1925 .

[51]  T. Menné,et al.  An update of the risk assessment for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) with focus on rinse‐off products , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[52]  J. Geier,et al.  Downward trend of sensitization to glyceryl monothioglycolate in German hairdressers. IVDK study group. Information Network of Departments of Dermatology. , 2000, Dermatology.

[53]  T. Menné,et al.  Risk assessment failures of chemicals commonly used in consumer products , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[54]  T. Agner,et al.  Genetic factors in nickel allergy evaluated in a population-based female twin sample. , 2004, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[55]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Preservatives in moisturizers on the Swedish market. , 1998, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[56]  T. Agner,et al.  Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981 , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[57]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[58]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults , 2001, Allergy.

[59]  B. Gruvberger,et al.  Occupational contact allergy and dermatitis from methylisothiazolinone after contact with wallcovering glue and after a chemical burn from a biocide. , 2004, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[60]  B. Hausen.  The sensitizing potency of Euxyl® K 400 and its components 1,2‐dibromo‐2,4‐dicyanobutane and 2‐phenoxyethanol , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[61]  A. W. Mcalester.  Nickel Sensitization from White Gold Spectacle Frames , 1931 .

[62]  D. Holness,et al.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis. , 1989, Clinical reviews in allergy.

[63]  M. Hannuksela.  Rapid increase in contact allergy to Kathon® CG in Finland , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[64]  A. Tosti,et al.  Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: the Italian experience , 1992 .

[65]  Marie-Louise Lind.  Dermatitis in hairdressers as a problem in chemical control. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[66]  R. Mayer,et al.  über Chromekzeme im graphischen Gewerbe , 1931 .

[67]  T. Menné,et al.  Quantitative aspects of contact allergy to chromium and exposure to chrome‐tanned leather , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[68]  M. Bruze,et al.  Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[69]  J. Foussereau.  An epidemiological study of contact allergy to 5‐chloro‐3‐methyl isothiazolone/3‐methyl isothiazolone in Strasbourg , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[70]  I. König,et al.  Cytokine gene polymorphisms in allergiccontact dermatitis , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[71]  E. Epstein,et al.  New cell formation in human sebaceous glands. , 1966, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[72]  A M Kligman,et al.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[73]  A. Fransway.  The Problem of Preservation in the 1990s: I. Statement of the Problem, Solution(s) of the Industry, and the Current Use of Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde-Releasing Biocides , 1991 .

[74]  B. Gruvberger.  Methylisothiazolinones. Diagnosis and prevention of allergic contact dermatitis. , 1997, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[75]  S. Cupferman,et al.  Experimental elicitation of contact allergy from a diazolidinyl urea‐preserved cream in relation to anatomical region, exposure time and concentration , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[76]  Christan Avnstorp.  Follow‐up of workers from the prefabricated concrete industry after the addition of ferrous sulphate to Danish cement , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[77]  S. Fregert,et al.  Reduction of chromate in cement by iron sulfate , 1979, Contact dermatitis.

[78]  J. Hegewald,et al.  The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003 – First results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[79]  A. Cannavó,et al.  Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: Patch test results in 379 hairdressers (1980–1993) , 1995 .

[80]  T. Agner,et al.  Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde‐sensitive patients , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[81]  J. Johansen,et al.  Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds – a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[82]  Wolfgang Uter,et al.  Computers in the Management of Contact Dermatitis , 2001 .

[83]  S. E. King,et al.  Threshold responses in formaldehyde-sensitive subjects. , 1979, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[84]  J. S. Taylor,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[85]  M. Beck,et al.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from Kathon® WT , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[86]  A. Schnuch,et al.  Decrease in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[87]  I. Dahlquist,et al.  Contact allergy to the preservative Kathon® CG , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[88]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug‐utilization research (CE‐DUR) approach , 2002, Contact dermatitis.